Wealth Management

Actively managed fixed income ETFs have gained remarkable traction, with over $100 billion in inflows in 2024 and growing demand expected for 2025. These ETFs, favored for their flexibility and expertise, have helped the ETF industry surpass $300 billion in fixed income assets this year. 

 

During VettaFi’s Market Outlook Symposium, 51% of advisors expressed plans to increase their exposure to actively managed funds next year, compared to only 20% for index-based options. 

 

Core, core-plus, and multi-sector active ETFs, such as Fidelity’s Total Bond ETF (FBND) and iShares’ Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC), have outperformed comparable passive funds. Active ETFs like JPMorgan’s Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) balance investment-grade bonds with speculative assets to enhance returns.


Finsum:  With strong performances and growing advisor interest, active fixed income ETFs are poised to remain a dominant force in fixed income investing.

Bitcoin surged past $107,000, hitting an all-time high following President-elect Donald Trump's pledge to create a U.S. bitcoin strategic reserve, mirroring the oil reserve system. This announcement, combined with the inclusion of Bitcoin-focused company MicroStrategy in the Nasdaq 100, fueled market optimism. 

 

Bitcoin rose over 50% since the November U.S. election, while Ethereum also saw gains. Trump, who has shifted to a pro-crypto stance, hinted at plans to establish the U.S. as a global crypto leader, naming crypto-friendly officials to key regulatory positions. 

 

Despite enthusiasm, analysts caution that implementing a bitcoin reserve could face significant delays and complexities. 


Finsum: Bitcoin's value has soared over 150% this year, reflecting increasing investor confidence in its regulatory and market potential.

Bahl & Gaynor recently launched two new dividend-focused ETFs, the Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and the Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV). Both funds aim to provide long-term dividend income and downside protection by investing in high-quality, dividend-paying equities. 

 

BGDV focuses on large-cap stocks with a 0.45% expense ratio, while SCDV targets small caps with a 0.70% expense ratio. These funds use a bottom-up stock selection strategy, emphasizing factors like historical performance, competitive advantages, and future cash flow potential. 

 

Sector exposure is not a primary focus but may tilt toward health care, financials, and industrials for SCDV and financials, industrials, and information technology for BGDV. 


Finsum: The bond market could have a tumultuous Q1 and income investors might want to look elsewhere for returns. 

Page 24 of 331

Contact Us

Newsletter

Subscribe

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top