Private credit managers often tout their locked-up capital as a key strength, insulating them from the kind of liquidity runs that plagued banks like Silicon Valley Bank. However, the rise of evergreen vehicles—funds allowing periodic redemptions—has introduced new vulnerabilities, especially as firms like Blackstone and Apollo have raised nearly $300 billion from retail investors. 

While evergreen funds offer some liquidity and mass appeal, especially through wealth advisors, their structure forces managers to continuously invest and meet redemptions, reducing the strategic flexibility that once defined private credit’s advantage. 

This could erode returns, particularly if managers are pressured to lend during inopportune times or sell illiquid assets at discounts to meet withdrawals. Though redemptions are capped and many investments naturally mature over time, a crisis could still lead to redemption surges that slow new lending and strain fund performance. 

Finsum: As evergreens attract less experienced investors and chase more capital, the sector risks undermining its own resilience unless managers remain disciplined and transparent.

As market volatility rattles investors, many are turning to buffer ETFs—funds that limit downside losses in exchange for capped upside gains. These products, offered by firms like Innovator, BlackRock, and Allianz, use options strategies to provide partial protection during market downturns, making them especially appealing during recent selloffs.

In the first months of the year, buffer ETFs attracted nearly $5 billion in inflows, with a sharp pickup in demand during periods of steep market declines, such as the S&P 500’s worst day in 2024. 

While financial advisors increasingly recommend buffer ETFs to nervous clients seeking equity exposure with built-in protection, critics point to their higher fees and reduced potential for gains in strong bull markets. The upside cap investors receive often shrinks in volatile environments, making the cost of protection steeper just when it feels most necessary. 

Finsum: For those prioritizing risk management over maximum returns, buffer ETFs offer a middle ground—at a price.

Bond investors are increasingly turning to separately managed accounts (SMAs), drawn by their tailored structures and greater control over investment exposure. Unlike commingled funds, SMAs allow institutional clients to directly own a customized portfolio of private credit assets while setting specific guidelines around leverage, risk, and liquidity. 

These accounts have surged in popularity as allocators seek greater transparency, fee flexibility, and alignment with their long-term liabilities. In credit, SMAs offer large investors more say over deal selection, co-investment rights, and sector targeting, often resulting in better economics and stronger governance. 

SMAs—privately negotiated investment vehicles managed by asset managers on behalf of a single client—stand in contrast to pooled funds and are favored by pensions, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds for their bespoke features. 

Finsum: SMAs are becoming a central tool for investors seeking to fine-tune their exposure while capitalizing on an asset class’s yield and downside protection.