This Bloomberg piece starts off by pointing of the oddity of equity investors taking refuge in oil stocks because of fears elsewhere. However, it quickly becomes clear why they are: high dividends that dwarf current returns nearly everywhere else. Royal Dutch Shell is currently paying a dividend of 6.7% and BP is paying 6.8%. That is far higher than the less than 1% you can earn on German ten-year bunds, so it is no wonder investors are fleeing into them. The stocks also offer low prices at present, as oil shares have been hammered by the rout in oil prices. However, as one strategist comments, “When you see an abnormally high yield relative to the market, that can either be fantastic value or it can be a value trap”. With the oil market looking to continue being heavily oversupplied, these dividends may prove the latter situation.
FINSUM: If you think oil will continue to muddle around where it is before possibly rising, then these stocks might be a good buy, as one can earn good dividend income while not seeing capital depreciation. However, they could prove a false economy if share prices tumble.
Last year Calpers, the largest public pension fund in the US, cuts its investments in hedge funds. This act was followed by several more announcements of large pension fund managers cutting their investments in the space. Many, including this publication, thought the hedge fund sector might take a hit because of the leadership of Calpers and others. However, that has proven untrue. This article highlights how total pension fund investment in hedge funds grew 4% last year despite total returns of only 3.3%, below the MSCI’s 5.5%. Experts in the space say the result is not a surprise, as “liquid alternatives” are seen as having an important diversification role for large investors. According to Preqin, the ten biggest investors in hedge funds increased their exposure to the sector by nearly 10%, or $183 bn, in the twelve months ending in June 2015.
FINSUM: Performance has been poor for some time. However, given volatility in bonds, and worries over a bubble in equities, one can derive a logic of using hedge funds as a diversifying tool. Their high costs of ownership by undermine this though.
Source: Financial Times
The Wall Street Journal has published an adviser-written article on the importance of the Supreme Court’s recent gay marriage ruling for advisers and their clients. The piece explains that since an earlier ruling on gay marriage in 2013, advising clients with same sex partners has been complicated, as differing state laws had to be accounted for. However, the piece says that now that the Supreme Court ruling has given everyone the right to same sex marriage, it should make advising easier, as the rules will be simpler. The author also raises the question of whether the new rules will be retroactively applied, which could affect clients. The piece gives a number of tips to advisers on what to look at when considering the new ruling’s impact on their clients, such as changing the wording for same-sex partners to “spouse” in living wills, health proxies, or when giving durable power of attorney.
FINSUM: The new ruling on same sex marriage gives a host of new considerations for advisers and their clients. This piece might be a good initial guide.
Source: Wall Street Journal