(New York)

One of the big worries in the Treasury market is that foreign demand is waning for Treasury bonds at the same time as supply is surging. This is leading many to stress that US government bond prices could be in for a big fall. However, Bloomberg says that won’t happen. The logic just isn’t there, and neither is the data to back it. Inflation and rates are rising, and so is the Dollar, making the bonds more attractive to hold. Further, US yields and credit-worthiness are looking increasingly positive given the bond market turmoil in Europe.

FINSUM: Because the Dollar is still the dominant world currency, there is a lot of built-in demand for Treasuries. And given the state of US yields versus the rest of the developed world, we don’t think foreign demand is going to shrink.

(New York)

Inflation has been ticking higher, but it has not been high enough to cause real concerns. Despite this, the Fed has still been very hawkish, hiking rates several times. Well, that mild inflation may be about to change. Anecdotal evidence of corporate behavior shows that companies are increasingly passing along costs to consumers. In everything from soda to bleach to cookies, companies have been raising prices. Explaining the moves, the CEO of Mondelez says “The consumer environment is strong”. Prices across the supply chain have been rising, helping to drive higher pricing.

FINSUM: Consumer sentiment and spending is strong and this seems like the ideal environment in which to raise prices. Thus we think headline inflation is going to start to rise.

(New York)

Financial advisors appear to not give a hoot about the forthcoming SEC Best Interest rule. Fatigue from the endless on-again-off-again DOL saga seems to have taken hold of the industry. A new survey by Fidelity found that 40% of advisors says that even though they are aware of the proposals, they are currently taking no action. A further 78% of advisors say they will need help in assessing and evaluating the proposals.

FINSUM: While there is definitely some fatigue, the reality is that most advisors did a lot of preparation for the fiduciary rule, and thus they think they are in a good position for the forthcoming SEC rule.

(New York)

Investors need to face reality (not that they aren’t), this Fed is more hawkish than any since the Crisis, and despite the market turmoil there will be yet another hike before the end of the year. Rates will keep rising so long as the economy stays strong. That means investors need to prepare. They have mostly done so by fleeing bond funds, but that may not be wise, as there are some very attractive funds that can help offset interest rate risk. For instance, check out the ProShares Investment Grade—Intr Rt Hdgd (IGHG) and the iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corp Bd ETF (LQDH). IGHG is particularly interesting because while both funds go long corporate bonds and short treasuries to produce zero duration, IGHG holds less BBB rated bonds and has a higher quality portfolio, all of which has let the fund appreciate this year even as rates rose strongly.

FINSUM: There are some very solid and creative bond funds out there to help offset rate risk while still earning decent yields. Given where equities are right now, these seem like good buys.

(New York)

For many years the prevailing mantra in the equity market had always been “buy the dip”. Every time the market fell, investors bought the dip and encouraged others to do so. However, that approach seems to have disappeared in the carnage of the last couple of weeks. Whereas falls used to be followed by rallies that pushed the market higher, the last few weeks has been characterized by more sustained losses with shallower rallies. Nordea Asset Management’s chief strategist sums up the mood change well, saying “We’ve seen a shift from buying on dips to selling into strength … We’re increasingly moving from glass half full to glass half empty; that’s the narrative here”.

FINSUM: We think that view sums it up well. While we do believe stocks won’t enter a bear market right now because earnings and the economy are solid, we sense that something in investors’ psyches has fundamentally changed.

(Beijing)

New data out of China suggests all is not well. A gauge of Chinese factory output fell to its lowest level in two years. The news arrives at the same time as the country is in a bear market. The data is particularly important because it shows the China’s economy is under pressure from US tariffs even if the direct effect has not showed up in trade data yet. One Chinese economist for ANZ Bank says “The economic conditions facing China’s private sector is much worse than what the headline figure suggests … Besides an expected reserve requirement ratio cut next January, we expect future supportive policy actions to be measured. The government’s priority is to avoid a financial blow-up”.

FINSUM: We think China is going to once again undertake stimulus measures to support the economy, but this time they will be facing a less accommodative trade environment.

(Shanghai)

If you or your clients own any Chinese focused ETFs, you will have noticed a glaring fact—they have hugely variant returns even when the underlying holdings don’t seem that obviously different. China is a study in how different index weightings and configurations can impact returns. For instance, Chinese stocks as a whole have fallen 21% this year, however the 40 or so Chinese focused ETFs in the US market have ranged from a 5% positive to negative 40% return. Even seemingly broad ETFs, like the iShares Large-Cap ETF, have very varying results, as despite the 21% fall, that ETF only dropped 13%. This is because it has a 50% weighting towards financial stocks, which were largely unscathed.

FINSUM: The key point here is to know what you are buying. Each of the indexes being tracked are quite unique, even if you think you are just buying a broad “China ETF”.

(New York)

For the first time in over a decade, Wall Street is giving more to the Democratic party than the Republican party. For the last ten years, big Wall Street banks and financial houses have leaned towards giving more to Republicans, who had a more favorable policy agenda. However, the pendulum seems to have swung the other way on the back of the kind of disruptions some current Republican policies may bring to bear (e.g. trade war). Bankers themselves are also giving more to Democrats.

FINSUM: Bloomberg framed this giving as an attempt by Wall Street to “soften a blue wave”. That sounds like a fair characterization to us—Wall Street wants to make sure to soften the hard edge of some possible forthcoming democrat policies.

(New York)

Is there gain ahead or pain ahead? That is the question on every investors’ mind. Well, Morgan Stanley has an answer. The bank’s chief US equity strategist, Michael Wilson, says that the answer is more pain. The bank thinks we are in a “rolling bear market” and that stocks will reach bear status soon. “We think we get there in four to eight weeks”, says Wilson. The bank defines a bear market as a drop of 20% or more with no recovery for 12 months. “Risk-reward remains unattractive for us”, he added.

FINSUM: Morgan Stanley thinks a lot of these losses come down to the change in central bank policy. We agree with that but we also think investors are just anxious about what lays ahead in terms of a possible recession, trade war, and beyond.

(New York)

Goldman Sachs thinks this selloff is “overdone” and that a rally is coming. The bank thinks the current market presents a good buying opportunity and forecasts the market to rise 7% before the end of the year. According to the bank “The recent sell-off has priced too sharp of a near-term growth slowdown. We expect continued economic and earnings growth will support a rebound in the S&P 500”. To play the rebound, the bank says to look at stocks in its “high quality” basket. These include: Mastercard, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Alphabet, Accenture, Ansys, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Edwards Lifesciences, International Flavors & Fragrances, and Ross Stores.

FINSUM: That is a very wide selection of choices, but more interesting to us is Goldman’s view on a recovery. We agree that this selloff seems to be an overreaction relative to the fundamentals.