At large brokerage firms, many financial advisors are realizing they don’t truly own their client relationships, limiting their autonomy and ability to serve clients freely. Over time, firms have tightened control through reduced payouts, restrictive policies, and the withdrawal of major players which once made advisor transitions easier. 

The traditional model has grown more corporate and centralized, leaving advisors to shoulder rising complexity while firms capture more of the value their clients generate. 

Meanwhile, the independent RIA space now offers the infrastructure, technology, and compliance support that used to be available only at large firms — but with far greater flexibility and ownership. Modern platforms and advanced tech stacks empower independent advisors to scale efficiently and serve clients on their own terms. 

Finsum: With clients increasingly loyal to their advisors rather than the firms themselves, independence no longer seems as risky. 

As investors prepare for year-end taxes after a volatile 2025, many are exploring ways to reduce their tax burden through strategies like tax loss harvesting and structural portfolio adjustments. Active ETFs, according to T. Rowe Price’s Kevin Signorelli and Chris Murphy, can play a key role in minimizing tax impacts. 

ETFs inherently generate fewer taxable events than mutual funds due to their creation and redemption mechanism, which limits capital gains distributions. Active ETFs add further efficiency, often operating at lower costs while maintaining flexibility to manage holdings strategically. 

They also offer effective vehicles for tax loss harvesting, allowing investors to shift from underperforming funds into more promising active strategies, such as international or tech-focused ETFs. 

Finsum: As active ETFs continue to expand, they provide investors with more tools to optimize portfolios for both performance and tax efficiency.

Demand for derivative income ETFs is unlikely to slow anytime soon, as these funds continue to provide consistent income and equity exposure amid a cloudy economic backdrop. 

The Federal Reserve’s evolving rate-cut path has also complicated duration positioning in fixed income portfolios, making alternative income strategies more attractive. The Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) stands out for its innovative structure, which ladders autocallable yield notes linked to the MerQube US Large-Cap Vol. Advantage Index. 

As long as the reference index stays above the -40% barrier, CAIE generates monthly income, offering resilience even in uneven markets. With a 14.36% distribution rate as of September 30, 2025, CAIE might be a derivative income strategies that could deliver strong yields while maintaining disciplined risk management.

Finsum: With uncertainty surrounding the U.S. outlook, from potential recession to stagflation, the downside protection these ETFs offer remains highly valuable.

Investor interest in international bonds has been accelerating, as July fund flows showed a marked uptick in overseas bond allocations, according to Morningstar data. This trend reflects a growing desire to diversify away from U.S. bond exposure, with Vanguard offering three compelling options for investors seeking global fixed income opportunities. 

A weaker dollar, pressured by expectations of falling rates, has further boosted the appeal of international assets, drawing more flows into global and emerging market bond funds. For those balancing domestic and global exposure, the Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) offers nearly equal allocations between U.S. and international bonds at a minimal 0.05% expense ratio. 

Investors who prefer a pure international approach may turn to the Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX), which focuses on developed markets, or the Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB), which provides higher yields through EM sovereign debt. 

Finsum: Total bond funds present flexible avenues for enhancing portfolio diversification and capturing income beyond U.S. borders.

The most successful macro investors don’t rely on predictions, they rely on true diversification. Rather than attempting to forecast markets, they construct portfolios of uncorrelated or negatively correlated assets that improve returns without adding risk. 

When multiple asset classes move independently, investors can use modest leverage to amplify gains while maintaining controlled volatility. This approach allows a portfolio with the same 5% volatility to generate higher expected returns simply by expanding exposure across uncorrelated assets. 

However, the strategy requires vigilance, as correlations can shift suddenly, undermining diversification’s benefits. 

Finsum: The foundation of long-term macro success lies in true diversification, careful leverage, and disciplined risk management.

Global investors are increasingly reallocating away from U.S. equities, even as Wall Street continues to notch record highs. Fund-flow data from Société Générale and EPFR show record inflows into global equity funds that exclude U.S. stocks, signaling a push for broader diversification. 

Europe and emerging markets have benefited most from this trend, with European equity products seeing record inflows this year. Currency effects and heightened U.S. policy risks under the Trump administration have also encouraged investors to look abroad. 

While many acknowledge the U.S. remains the world’s deepest and most dynamic market, its high valuations and narrow leadership have amplified concentration risks. 

Finsum: Portfolio managers showed a more globally balanced approach, blending exposure to the U.S. with selectively priced opportunities overseas.

The Pulse survey shows that advisors are shifting toward more flexible mandates, reducing allocations to core fixed income while increasing exposure to multisector fixed income and alternatives.  U.S. large-cap stocks—especially growth and blend styles—continued to dominate allocations, fueled in part by AI tailwinds and earnings strength. 

Active strategies also gained share, including active ETFs, which surged in usage over the past year. On the fixed-income side, core bond exposure was trimmed as advisors looked to diversify diversifiers like high yield, multi-sector, and credit-sensitive sectors. 

The average model portfolio holds around 16 distinct positions, and allocations to alternative strategies increased, with defined-outcome and multi-strategy mandates among the fastest-growing categories. 

Finsum: Advisors should look to factor portfolio tools to leverage in construction to better serve their clients’ needs. 

Stable value funds are a conservative investment option that aim to deliver higher returns than cash while preserving principal. They invest in high-quality bonds that are insured through contracts like guaranteed investment contracts or group annuities, which protect investors from losing money. 

These funds are available only in tax-advantaged retirement plans such as 401(k)s, and according to MetLife, more than 80% of defined contribution plans offer them. Stable value funds are often compared to money market funds, since both are designed for safety and stability. Over the 15 years ending March 2023, stable value funds delivered an annualized return of 2.99%, significantly higher than the 0.55% produced by money market funds. 

While money markets adjust quickly to interest rate changes, stable value funds respond more gradually, which can lead to short-term underperformance when rates are rising. Researching stable value funds involves looking at the fund’s goals, portfolio composition, fees, and historical performance.

Finsum: Advisors should also evaluate management tenure and ensure the fund’s returns align with its stated objectives for clients

While standard ETFs are built for long-term investors, more complex products like leveraged, inverse, and synthetic ETFs are designed for short-term or specialized strategies and carry higher risks. Leveraged ETFs amplify daily index returns, but compounding effects mean they often underperform over longer periods, making them unsuitable for buy-and-hold investors. 

Inverse ETFs, by contrast, rise when their benchmark falls and are typically used as temporary hedges against downturns rather than core holdings.

Synthetic ETFs take a different approach by using swap agreements with banks to replicate index performance instead of directly owning the securities, which reduces tracking error but introduces counterparty risk. These advanced products can be useful in the right hands, yet they require a clear understanding of their mechanics and limitations. 

Finsum: These tools can be tactical moves, not long-term wealth building, but serve short term client desires.

The U.S. stock market set new highs in Q3 2025, and while index funds largely outperformed, active funds were more mixed. Among the 10 largest active funds, only the JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund stood out, returning 9.3% and ranking in the top third of its category, while the Dodge & Cox Stock Fund lagged with just 3.2%. 

Index funds fared better, with the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund delivering 8.2% and ranking highest among its peers, though the Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund landed near the middle of its category.

Over the past three years, seven of the 10 largest active funds have outperformed their categories, led by two Capital Group funds that landed in the top decile of large-cap blend. Index funds also showed consistent strength, with S&P 500 trackers like Vanguard, Fidelity, and iShares ranking in the top quartile over that period. 

Finsum: Investors looking to capitalize on falling interest rates should look to large cap growth as they tend to be more interest rate sensitive.