(New York)

Investors beware, the strongest predictor of recession has just rung its bell. An inverted yield curve has predicted all six of the US recessions going back 60 years. And while all of investors’ focus has been on whether the Treasury yield curve will invert, the global yield curve already has. The yield on the ICE Bank of America index of government bonds due in 7 to 10 years has already inverted, with such yields being lower than for 1 to 3 year bonds. While the US economy is currently looking strong, there is growing weakness in Europe, China, and emerging markets, which seems to have inverted the curve. The IMF says the clouds over the world’s economy are “getting darker by the day”.

FINSUM: It is seeming more and more like we will have a global recession. Though, the US seems like it will be the last to succumb to it. One thing to remember—in the US it takes an average of 18.5 months from when the curve inverts to when we reach the peak of the growth cycle.

(New York)

That headline might have played with your mind a bit, and rightly so. Since financials generally trade alongside the direction of the economy, buying them ahead of a recession seems like folly. However, the truth is that financials tend to perform strongly for the 18 months that follow a yield curve inversion (or near one). Inversions do tend to strongly signal a forthcoming recession, but it generally takes 18.5 months from when it happens for the cycle to actually reach its peak, a period when stocks had median gains of 21%.

FINSUM: So this is a purely historical performance-based article, which is always dicey. However, it is a good point that the length of time between a yield curve inversion and a growth peak can be considerable.

(New York)

Back in late 2016, Merrill Lynch announced that it was abandoning commissions for its brokers. On the back of the shift to the DOL’s fiduciary rule, the firm was forcing clients to either move to fee-based accounts or downgrade to its Merrill Edge discount brokerage. Now, with the DOL rule gone, the firm is considering reversing that decision. Merrill admits that some clients left the firm because the cost of fee-based accounts was more expensive than commissions. Merrill will be considering a change for a 60-day review period.

FINSUM: Having only fee-based accounts always seemed like a bad idea to us because a large subset of customers would see their total fees rise significantly. However, the move fit nicely with the pre-DOL rule environment. Now that things have changed, we suspect the stance might be reversed.

(Washington)

There have been a handful of articles lately presenting how one can protect their portfolio from the current trade war (hint, stay away from food companies and autos). But there have been many fewer saying how to buy into the trade war. The answer is that investors should buy less vulnerable sectors, such as semiconductors and biotechnology, which will not be as impacted by tariffs. Banks are also likely to prosper as the economy continues its run.

FINSUM: We think the idea of biotech and banks is quite a solid one. Both seem to have little direct exposure to tariffs.

(New York)

A new study out of Harvard makes a very interesting point about US home prices. While real estate prices have seen a strong and steady rise since the bottoms of the Crisis, and prices in many markets seem very lofty, the truth is that the cost of owning a home actually hasn’t risen for the last thirty years. How is that possible? The answer is that while home prices have risen compared to income, interest rates have also fallen strongly, meaning the monthly mortgage payment it costs to actually own a home has remained pretty much flat sine 1987 (on an inflation-adjusted basis).

FINSUM: So this is a good point, but the reality is that the monthly payment does not account for the huge down payment that families now need to come up with (which they did not back when interest rates were at 12%).