Wealth Management
In an article for Wealth Management, Iraklis Kourtidis discusses how the investment industry needs to evolve in order to reduce risk and improve returns. Essentially, it tends to look at the past to make assumptions about the future, specifically regarding correlations between asset classes.
He believes that too much time and energy is spent on discussing how investments have performed in the past which doesn’t make sense in a world with efficient markets. Instead, investors and advisors need to pay more attention to the future. And, this is even more important with the advent of direct indexing.
Kourtidis believes there are better questions to ask with direct indexing such as will these investments adhere closely to my values? Another is will this strategy properly weigh the tradeoffs between tracking errors, tax efficiency, and personal values? Finally, investors and advisors need to determine whether the additional cost and effort of direct indexing will yield better results than a traditional approach, specifically in terms of tax benefits?
These are forward-looking questions that do have answers unlike questions about the market’s direction, monetary policy, or portfolio returns. Overall, direct indexing means that investors need to consider a different set of questions.
Finsum: Direct indexing creates an entirely different set of opportunities and challenges for investors and advisors. Here are some things they need to consider that they wouldn’t with traditional investin
Yields on Treasuries shot higher following the June ADP private sector jobs report which came in much stronger than expected at 497,000 vs 228,000. This is a continuation of a trend in recent months, showing that economic growth and the labor market are defying consensus predictions of a recession.
In fact, many analysts now believe that the economy could be re-accelerating which has major implications for fixed income and equities. Immediately following the report, odds increased for rate hikes at the next 2 FOMC meetings, and odds for a cut in the first quarter of 2024 sharply declined.
Higher yields and tighter monetary policy are certainly headwinds for equities and fixed income. Additionally, one of the catalysts for the recent rally in equities has been expectations of an imminent Fed pivot given weakening inflation and a softening labor market. Yet, data over the last month have made it clear that the Fed still has more work to do to achieve its objectives.
It’s also interesting to note that yields on shorter-term Treasuries are now approaching their highs from early March. Further, the decline from March into May following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and distress at other regional banks has been entirely reversed.
Finsum: Fixed income weakened following the ADP jobs report which showed that private sector hiring was twice as strong as expected. Ultimately, the report likely means that rates will go higher and stay elevated for longer than expected.
In a piece for Bloomberg, Michael McKenzie and Ye Xie discuss recent economic data which has dispelled the notion that the economy is on the verge of a recession. This has resulted in traders pushing back their timeline of when the Fed will start its rate-cutting cycle and increases the odds that the Fed will continue hiking rates.
Both developments are bearish for fixed income. YTD, the asset class has enjoyed strong gains but this was, in part, due to expectations that inflation and economic growth will continue trending lower, leading to a pivot in Fed policy.
In addition to these catalysts, inflows into fixed income have been strong as traders look to lock in higher yields. Yet, these yields are here to stay at least for some time given the stickiness of inflation and the resilience of the labor market and consumer spending.
Clearly, the market has been caught off guard as well. This is evident from the huge jumps in yields on short-term Treasuries following better than expected jobs reports in recent months. Additionally after a short blip higher, jobless claims are once again trending lower, indicating that while turnover has increased, the economy continues to add jobs.
Finsum: Fixed income has performed well YTD, but the asset class’ gains are eroding as the odds of a recession and imminent Fed rate cut cycle have diminished.
More...
In an article for SmartAsset, Patrick Villanova CEPF discusses the pros and cons of investing for retirement in TIPS, Treasuries, and annuities. All of these are methods for retirees to generate income during their retirement. And, this is increasingly needed given that traditional pensions are being phased out of existence.
TIPS are treasuries that are designed to protect against inflation. In essence, the yield is fixed, while the principal varies based on inflation. Some will create income through buying TIPS of different maturities, creating an income stream that is indexed to inflation.
An annuity functions similarly but without the inflation component. Essentially, it’s a way to turn cash into an income stream. Treasuries are the most straightforward vehicle for saving, and it’s the benchmark that other methods are compared against.
According to Villanova, the best strategy ultimately depends on a retiree’s lifespan and the rate of inflation. Assuming a moderate inflation rate of 2.5%, Treasuries would outperform annuities and TIPS slightly. If inflation returned to levels seen in the past decade, then Treasuries would perform the best. If inflation were to average 5%, then the TIPS strategy would handily outperform Treasuries and annuities.
However, annuities would handily outperform in the event that a retiree lives longer than 20 years. Given that the income of annuities is fixed, the value of this income would be diluted by higher levels of inflation.
Finsum: Annuities, TIPS, and Treasuries are 3 of the most popular methods to create income during retirement. Patrick Villanova compares and contrasts each to see which is the best strategy for retirees.
In RealMoney, Jim Collins, the founder and President of Excelsior Capital, discusses his DEATH model portfolio which bets against hype-fueled companies via short-selling and put options.
The portfolio has a 74% gain over the past year, even managing to hold onto impressive gains despite recent strength in equities. It has a simple construction of 10 equally weighted positions. The guiding principle behind the company is to bet against shaky companies with lofty valuations.
Some examples include Teladoc Health and SelectQuote which were among the best-performing stocks in 2020. However, this resulted in valuations that reached absurd levels. Collins believes that one factor in these stocks’ gains were inflows into Ark Investments’ family of funds as these were two of its largest holdings. Now, these stocks are falling back to Earth in terms of valuation and stock price, while Collins sees more downside.
Collins believes that these short-selling opportunities emerge when analysts and fund managers stop applying basic principles of valuation to their holdings. He cites Peloton as an example given its massive valuation that was similar to a software company despite the company being in the business of selling exercise equipment which is historically a competitive, low-margin business.
Finsum: Even with recent strength in equities, Jim Collins continues to see opportunity on the short-side. His DEATH model portfolio is constructed to bet against 10 of the most hype-fueled companies in the market.
In an article for InvestmentNews, Mark Schoeff Jr. covers the latest developments in the SEC and FINRA’s implementation of Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI). Reg BI was passed in 2019 and implemented in 2020. It requires brokers to only recommend products to customers that are in their best interests, while also informing clients of any potential conflicts of interest and financial benefits to them.
There were some questions about how Reg BI would fit in along with ‘fiduciary duty’ which is another standard that brokers must abide by. Based on recent SEC comments, it seems as if the Reg BI and fiduciary duty are working in tandem to ensure that brokers are placing their clients’ interests above their own. They also stress that although both may be triggered at different times, they are having a similar impact in terms of promoting better behavior from brokers.
In recent months, enforcement of Reg BI and the fiduciary standard have increased. In part, it’s due to greater clarity around the topic and a change in SEC leadership to Chair Gary Gensler and control of the body by Democrats. Until Gensler’s tenure, Republicans see Reg BI as the primary tool for oversight, while Democrats traditionally favor the fiduciary standard.
Finsum: One area of confusion has been the implementation of Reg BI which overlaps with the fiduciary standard for broker-dealers. Recently, the SEC has been saying that both are effective tools that are resulting in better behavior for brokers.