The old balancing act. You know; the one where retirees seek a balance between gaining a foothold on sufficient income and hanging on to wealth.

Oh yeah. That one. Look out below, because it can be precarious, according to thestreet.com.

Well, consider this tactic: an allocation to cash like, short direction, high quality bond ETFs, supplanting part of the usual aggregate bond fund allocation.

In light of a jump in interest rates, the inclination is for a sag in bond prices, putting a dent in the value of bond funds. That’s when short duration, high quality bond ETFs can provide a buffer.

On the other hand, investors, regardless of age and stages of life, are right for ETFs – and especially so for retirees on the precipice of retirement, according to moneysense.ca.

Within the financial cycle, The Money Sense ETF list is right for all ages and stages, retirees can safely contemplate a solid subset of picks. A panel of seven ETF experts selects the list. The panel didn’t per se formally designate any of its picks as “retirement friendly,”

Think recruiting for succession planning is a piece of proverbial cake? Well, ha!

That’s because, to the contrary, errors can be common, according to linkedin.com. So, how do you increase your chances of sidestepping them in the recruiting process aimed at such planning? 

A few tips:

• Assess your current and future needs
• Develop a talent pool and a succession plan
• Use objective and consistent methods
• Involve multiple stakeholders and perspectives
• Monitor and evaluate your results

Now, ask yourself: if your most essential employees bolted – and bolted today – would you be up the old creek – or do you have a successor who had the knowledge, training and skills to pay dividends and fill the void?

Workplace data’s all that and more, according to hr.nih/gov. It can abet your ability to visualize your workforce, such as, for instance, the volume of employees eligible to call it a day. Well, leveraging data, you can visualize representation of the workforce, which is a great way to gain support – not to mention – interest, in succession planning.

Here’s a suggestion: in the course or workforce discussion, strategic planning – and as you break bread over your mission -- provide your leadership with a summary of workforce data, complete with the snapshot. Doing so will reinforce how important workforce planning is.

The ‘why now’ and what’s to come for middle-office outsourcing

During the post-2008 financial crisis volatility, the popularity of outsourcing key middle- and back-office functions rose as asset managers saw the value of an outsourced operating model. We have recently seen how market volatility has created operational challenges for fund managers due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent instability in the banking system. As a result, there is a renewed need for real-time transparency into counterparty exposure, securities exposure and available liquidity. Demand is growing for ready-to-deploy technology and talent to mitigate the impact of market uncertainty on managers’ portfolios.

Market uncertainty also compels managers to look for ways to control costs and make them more predictable while creating scale. Internal middle-office teams are often regarded as a business expense, susceptible to high employee turnover and replacement costs. Technology savings are also a key factor driving middle office outsourcing, as managers recognize owning and maintaining best-in-class technology makes limited financial sense in the long run.

The demand for a more efficient exchange of information, coupled with cost control measures, has motivated asset managers to look at outsourcing.

Why Now? 

In its May 2023 Insights Report, Hedgeweek found the outsourcing trend is accelerating, with around 60% of hedge funds outsourcing back-office functions and 40% outsourcing the middle office. Some 34% of firms surveyed said they were planning to outsource more. There are three primary motivations:

1. Outsourcing allows firms to focus on their core competencies and securing the best possible deals. Moreover, working with a service provider brings specialized expertise in various asset classes and geographies, shortening the time to market for new product launches. Leveraging a service provider’s resources and expertise on key business strategies makes scaling in a dynamic market easier. 

1. Access to advanced technology without a costly in-house build-out. Not only is there no high upfront cost nor ongoing maintenance, but an effective middle-office service provider can also rationalize and connect data across multiple processes. A centralized data approach can bring efficiency gains and data integrity.

1. Outsourcing makes it easier to achieve scale while controlling costs. For firms in growth mode, increased acquisition activity, multi-jurisdictional operations, maintaining operational governance, data complexity and increased investor scrutiny are just a few challenges outsourcing helps address. 

What’s to come for middle-office outsourcing?

Outsourced operating models must have the flexibility to adapt to the changing business needs of managers. Today, firms are seeking support in such areas as:

• Lifecycle support across all asset classes, including publicly traded securities, complex fixed income such as bank debt and distressed debt, illiquid OTC derivatives, real assets and other static assets.
• Consolidated investment reporting and analysis to tell the “story” so managers can extract meaningful data quickly and easily.
• Investment-level forecasting, both in terms of liquidity requirements and scenario planning, to account for varying degrees of market uncertainty.
• CSDR and T+1 settlement requirements put pressure on managers to meet strict deadlines. Outsourcing to a provider with an automation infrastructure and effective post-trade processes will enable managers to accelerate their readiness.

The full lift-out vs. select activities 

As disruptions to day-to-day operations weigh on fund managers, many consider the benefits of a full lift-out of their middle and back-office operations systems and staff. In the full lift-out scenario, the most significant benefits to a firm are cost savings, scalability, immediate access to industry-leading expertise, and staff continuity. Any growing firm looking to get into new markets or reduce the cost of its operational infrastructure stands to benefit from a lift-out. Smaller managers, however, may find it easier to outsource selected operational activities. 

The ways hedge funds manage their operations is evolving. Many asset and fund managers have outsourced their back-office operations for years, but more are realizing many other functions can also be performed more efficiently by an external service provider – putting the middle office in the spotlight. Funds of all sizes want to focus on investing, not operations; outsourcing allows them to find this balance. 

To learn more about Middle Office outsourcing and SS&C download the whitepaper ‘Three Key Drivers of Middle Office Outsourcing’

The ‘why now’ and what’s to come for middle-office outsourcing

During the post-2008 financial crisis volatility, the popularity of outsourcing key middle- and back-office functions rose as asset managers saw the value of an outsourced operating model. We have recently seen how market volatility has created operational challenges for fund managers due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent instability in the banking system. As a result, there is a renewed need for real-time transparency into counterparty exposure, securities exposure and available liquidity. Demand is growing for ready-to-deploy technology and talent to mitigate the impact of market uncertainty on managers’ portfolios.

Market uncertainty also compels managers to look for ways to control costs and make them more predictable while creating scale. Internal middle-office teams are often regarded as a business expense, susceptible to high employee turnover and replacement costs. Technology savings are also a key factor driving middle office outsourcing, as managers recognize owning and maintaining best-in-class technology makes limited financial sense in the long run.

The demand for a more efficient exchange of information, coupled with cost control measures, has motivated asset managers to look at outsourcing.

Why Now? 

In its May 2023 Insights Report, Hedgeweek found the outsourcing trend is accelerating, with around 60% of hedge funds outsourcing back-office functions and 40% outsourcing the middle office. Some 34% of firms surveyed said they were planning to outsource more. There are three primary motivations:

1. Outsourcing allows firms to focus on their core competencies and securing the best possible deals. Moreover, working with a service provider brings specialized expertise in various asset classes and geographies, shortening the time to market for new product launches. Leveraging a service provider’s resources and expertise on key business strategies makes scaling in a dynamic market easier. 

1. Access to advanced technology without a costly in-house build-out. Not only is there no high upfront cost nor ongoing maintenance, but an effective middle-office service provider can also rationalize and connect data across multiple processes. A centralized data approach can bring efficiency gains and data integrity.

1. Outsourcing makes it easier to achieve scale while controlling costs. For firms in growth mode, increased acquisition activity, multi-jurisdictional operations, maintaining operational governance, data complexity and increased investor scrutiny are just a few challenges outsourcing helps address. 

What’s to come for middle-office outsourcing?

Outsourced operating models must have the flexibility to adapt to the changing business needs of managers. Today, firms are seeking support in such areas as:

• Lifecycle support across all asset classes, including publicly traded securities, complex fixed income such as bank debt and distressed debt, illiquid OTC derivatives, real assets and other static assets.
• Consolidated investment reporting and analysis to tell the “story” so managers can extract meaningful data quickly and easily.
• Investment-level forecasting, both in terms of liquidity requirements and scenario planning, to account for varying degrees of market uncertainty.
• CSDR and T+1 settlement requirements put pressure on managers to meet strict deadlines. Outsourcing to a provider with an automation infrastructure and effective post-trade processes will enable managers to accelerate their readiness.

The full lift-out vs. select activities 

As disruptions to day-to-day operations weigh on fund managers, many consider the benefits of a full lift-out of their middle and back-office operations systems and staff. In the full lift-out scenario, the most significant benefits to a firm are cost savings, scalability, immediate access to industry-leading expertise, and staff continuity. Any growing firm looking to get into new markets or reduce the cost of its operational infrastructure stands to benefit from a lift-out. Smaller managers, however, may find it easier to outsource selected operational activities. 

The ways hedge funds manage their operations is evolving. Many asset and fund managers have outsourced their back-office operations for years, but more are realizing many other functions can also be performed more efficiently by an external service provider – putting the middle office in the spotlight. Funds of all sizes want to focus on investing, not operations; outsourcing allows them to find this balance. 

To learn more about Middle Office outsourcing and SS&C download the whitepaper ‘Three Key Drivers of Middle Office Outsourcing’

2023 has seen a modest rebound for REITs despite rates continuing to move higher, no indications of an imminent Fed pivot, and a serious crisis in commercial real estate. One factor is that overall revenues have stabilized and balance sheets remain healthy. Another factor is that healthcare and industrial REITs are seeing revenue growth at a nearly double-digit rate despite the headwind of higher rates. 

During Q2 earnings season, funds from operations climbed 4.2% compared to last year’s Q2, totaling $20.6 billion. There is also no compromise in terms of financing with 79% of REITs using unsecured debt with 91% of overall debt locked in at fixed rates, meaning there is less sensitivity to rates. 

Another silver lining is that leverage ratios remain below 35% while the average term to maturity is close to seven years. In total for publicly traded REITs, the cost of capital is currently 4%. Given these financials, REITs are also better to take advantage of turmoil in real estate markets as they will be able to access financing at a lower cost of capital than private market operators. 

Finsum: Q2 earnings season is over. The much maligned REIT sector continues to see stable revenue growth and healthy financials despite a challenging environment.