Displaying items by tag: advisors
5 Ways Advisors Can Drive Business Through Social Media
There are numerous ways advisors can generate leads for their business such as word-of-mouth marketing or cold-calling, but social media can provide them with a much larger landscape in which to work and is less time-consuming. That is according to Rebecca Lake who recommended five ways for advisors to drive business through social media in an article on SmartAsset. In terms of which social media platform to use, that depends on your target client demographics. For instance, if your target client is younger, your best bet is on Instagram, TikTok, or Twitter. But if your target client is older, then you might get better results on Facebook or YouTube. Lake’s first tip is to be authentic as it’s essential to build trust with prospective clients. For instance, you could share a little about yourself on social media. Her next tip is to be consistent, as it’s also important in building trust. Posting quality content on a regular schedule is ideal. Lake’s third tip is to provide value. The content has to provide value for the people who see it. Plus, valuable content gets shared, which can help you attract even more business. The next tip is to engage with the people viewing your content. This could include replying to comments or even asking your followers to participate in a survey. The fifth and final tip is to be compliant with federal regulations and your firm’s regulations.
Finsum:Rebecca Lake, a contributor for SmartAsset, provided five tips for advisors to drive business through social media, including being authentic, consistent, compliant, providing value, and engaging with followers.
Private Equity Firms See Opportunity Amid Market Volatility
With market volatility still a concern among clients, private equity firms are positioning themselves as an option for advisors looking to minimize the impact of volatility in their client’s portfolios. Steve Brennan, head of Private Wealth Solutions at Conshohocken, Pennsylvania-based Hamilton Lane, told Financial Advisor magazine, “A benefit to a private equity fund is that it is a long-term investment vehicle that gives an investor an extended period to invest their money and protect it from the turbulence of the markets.” Private equity proponents say that the lower volatility typically outweighs the negatives of private equity, including high fees and illiquidity. Brennan said “The time horizon for investors in the private markets is ... a much longer time period so you’re not seeing the volatility in the private markets that you would see in the public markets.” Alexis Weber, chief investment officer and founder of PM Alpha told the magazine that a client’s private equity allocation should be fluid. He suggested a range of 5% to 20%, but also cautioned advisors that it depended upon the client’s risk tolerance. He also mentioned that private equity can be a benefit to an advisor looking to distinguish themselves from their competitors. He stated, “Really having the right level of allocation to these instruments allows them to differentiate their services and their portfolio construction approach from other peers.”
Finsum:Private equity firms are positioning themselves as an option for advisors looking to minimize volatility for their clients as well as differentiate themselves from their peers.
Direct Indexing Isn’t Just for Ultra-Wealthy Clients Anymore
With direct indexing continuing to gain steam, the strategy isn’t just for the ultra-wealthy anymore, according to two panelists at the recent ETF Exchange conference in Miami. According to Randy Bullard, global head of wealth management at Charles River Development, any investor with more than $150,000 can benefit from these custom portfolios. Bullard stated that “Today an advisor might use direct indexing for clients with complex and unique investment policy requirements, but in the future, direct indexing won’t be such a niche thing.” Ben Hammer, head of client development for Vanguard Personalized Indexing, agrees and said “personalized indexing” can benefit many investors. For Hammer, direct indexing is simple, “It’s an individual account that’s managed to track an index. The individual owns the securities, which gives them flexibility to do things that they can’t with a fund. For example, when individual stocks are down, the investor can tax-loss-harvest them to offset gains elsewhere in their portfolio.” Hammer also noted that direct indexing can give advisors an “additional edge“ in their business. He stated, “They can utilize this to really establish an excellent tax profile for a client that might have some complications or give them an extra bit of customization.” However, Bullard acknowledged that direct indexing right now is for equities, not other asset classes.
Finsum:According to two panelists at the recent ETF Exchange conference, any investor with over $150,000 in assets would benefit from direct indexing, as would advisors by providing them an “additional edge“ in their practice.
Direct Indexing Isn’t Just for Ultra-Wealthy Clients Anymore
With direct indexing continuing to gain steam, the strategy isn’t just for the ultra-wealthy anymore, according to two panelists at the recent ETF Exchange conference in Miami. According to Randy Bullard, global head of wealth management at Charles River Development, any investor with more than $150,000 can benefit from these custom portfolios. Bullard stated that “Today an advisor might use direct indexing for clients with complex and unique investment policy requirements, but in the future, direct indexing won’t be such a niche thing.” Ben Hammer, head of client development for Vanguard Personalized Indexing, agrees and said “personalized indexing” can benefit many investors. For Hammer, direct indexing is simple, “It’s an individual account that’s managed to track an index. The individual owns the securities, which gives them flexibility to do things that they can’t with a fund. For example, when individual stocks are down, the investor can tax-loss-harvest them to offset gains elsewhere in their portfolio.” Hammer also noted that direct indexing can give advisors an “additional edge“ in their business. He stated, “They can utilize this to really establish an excellent tax profile for a client that might have some complications or give them an extra bit of customization.” However, Bullard acknowledged that direct indexing right now is for equities, not other asset classes.
Finsum:According to two panelists at the recent ETF Exchange conference, any investor with over $150,000 in assets would benefit from direct indexing, as would advisors by providing them an “additional edge“ in their practice.
Why Some Advisors Refuse to Use Model Portfolios
The case for model portfolios has never been better. Investment managers are expanding their model portfolio offerings while turnkey asset management platforms continue to grow. Since portfolio management is just one piece of a financial plan, why wouldn’t advisors want to take advantage of model portfolios to free up time to spend with their clients? However, some advisors have a reason for resisting this trend and insist on managing portfolios themselves. For instance, Ryan Johnson, managing director at Buckingham Advisors told InvestmentNews, “By managing our own portfolios, we’re adding value.” Johnson added that they feel they have a lot of control over the individual stock selection, especially when it comes to tax planning. Paul Schatz, president of Heritage Capital also mentioned control as to why he builds client portfolios from scratch. He stated, “Control is a huge driver.” Robert Steinberg, chief executive at RIA Blue Chip Partners told the magazine that they focus on individual securities since “clients are more involved, it’s easier to tax-loss harvest, they know what they own.” While a 2020 research report from InvestmentNews cited numerous reasons for outsourcing portfolio management such as freeing up time, some advisors still see portfolio management as a core component of financial planning. The report also listed the top reasons for not using a model portfolio such as investment research strength, flexibility, and cost.
Finsum:While model portfolios continue to gain steam among financial advisors, there are still some that prefer to build portfolios themselves due to control, adding value, and getting clients more involved.