Wealth Management
One of the big stories of 2022 was the failure of the 60/40 portfolio. The 40% allocation to bonds is supposed to help protect investors during downturns, but during markets like last year where both stock and bonds fell, the portfolio failed. Now, strategists are looking for ways to improve the 60/40 portfolio. In a recent panel discussion at the New York Stock Exchange, industry experts spoke about “The Rise of Alternatives and the New 60/40 Portfolio.” Asset management professionals and advisers talked about methods to diversify and target new sources of income for retirement savers. Kimberly Ann Flynn, the managing director of XA Investments, said “An available alternative is a mutual fund wrap with added investments such as managed futures and commodity futures, which exist in the category of liquid alternatives.” She added, “I think with now this big push again looking at 60/40, it’s just diversification away from U.S. equity. I think some of these liquid alternatives are going to see a resurgence. In terms of performance, long-short equity performed well, on a relative basis and absolute basis. Some of the managed futures strategies performed really well.” Brian Chiappinelli, a Managing Director at Cambridge Associates, said that another alternative gaining momentum is the collective investment trust (CIT). He stated that “CITs have more leeway to add alternatives that are customized to a particular employee demographic.”
Finsum: After the blood bath in 2022, asset managers and advisors are looking for new ways to improve the 60/40 portfolio, including adding alternatives such as managed futures, commodity futures, or utilizing a CIT.
While many investors who care about the environment have piled money into funds that focus on ESG strategies, they probably don’t know how much they are paying. That is according to a new study, which found that “at the average ESG fund, the effective fees can be three times what’s reported.” The reason for this is that ESG funds are nowhere near as pure as they look to be. According to a new Harvard study, on average, ESG funds have 68% of their assets invested in “the exact same” holdings as non-ESG funds. So, for every dollar you invest in an ESG fund, a little less than a third goes into stocks you could have gotten in a fund that isn’t ESG. The average ESG U.S. stock ETF charges 0.17% in annual fees, according to Morningstar, 0.05 percentage points more than non-ESG funds. Finance professor Malcolm Baker of Harvard Business School, one of the study’s authors, said, “Although only about a third of your money in the average ESG fund is distinctly green, you incur the fees on the entire portfolio. Therefore, you’re really paying three times as much for the thing you care about, the differentiated piece of the portfolio.”
Finsum:A recent study found that on average, 68% of holdings in ESG funds are the exact same as holdings in non-ESG funds, which makes these funds three times more expensive than you think.
FINRA recently announced that it has fined and censured a New York firm for violations of some of the basic written and supervisory requirements of Regulation Best Interest. The violations date back to June 2020 when the advice standards went into effect. The regulatory body charged the Long Island Financial Group, a five-person broker-dealer based in Roslyn, N.Y., with failure to supervise and “to establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance” with the regulation that requires advisors to put customers’ best interests ahead of their own financial gain. The firm settled the charges for a $35,000 fine, without admitting or denying guilt. The broker-dealer also received a public censure and is required to certify that it has remedied the compliance failures within 90 days. According to FINRA, Long Island Financial Group also “failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written supervisory procedures, reasonably designed to achieve compliance with Reg BI.” In addition, the firm also failed to deliver to its clients Form CRS, the customer relationship summary that broker-dealer clients and prospects are supposed to receive, explaining the firm’s service offerings, products, fees, and conflicts of interest.
Finsum:A small NY firm was fined and censured by FINRA for failure to supervise, maintain, and enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with Reg BI.
More...
J.P. Morgan Advisors continues to boost its advisor headcount with the latest addition of a Boston-based Merrill Lynch team that generates $2 million in revenue. The team is led by Andrew Parvey and Maureen Wilson who oversee $200 million in client assets. They moved to J.P. Morgan along with support staffers Victoria Steele and Ko Dong. Parve started his career at Olde Discount Corp. in 1996 and also worked at Gruntal & Co., and Citigroup’s Smith Barney before joining Merrill in 2008. Wilson started her career as a personal banker at Bank of America in 2003, and worked at Chase between 2005 and 2007, before restarting her brokerage career in 2015 at Merrill. They will report to Rick Penafiel, regional director for Boston, Miami, and Palm Beach. This marks the second Merrill team to join J.P. Morgan Advisors in as many months. Another team led by Marc Karstaedt in New York City joined in January. The Advisors unit, which JPMorgan acquired from Bear Stearns during the financial crisis, has around 450 advisors. In July 2021, the group announced a plan to double its headcount over the next five to seven years. J.P. Morgan ended last year with 5,029 total advisors, up 6% from the prior year.
Finsum:J.P. Morgan lured away its second Merrill Lynch team in as many months in a bid to boost its advisor headcount.
For decades, the wealthy have been able to see huge tax savings. Over one hundred years ago, investors could take tax deductions on wash sales, which involved selling a security at a loss and then buying back the same security. While Congress outlawed that technique in 1921, investment firms have continued to help billionaires save on taxes through other techniques such as tax-loss harvesting, which allows an investor to sell an investment for a loss and replace it with a reasonably similar investment. Direct indexing, which continues to gain steam among advisors, provides the perfect strategy to employ tax-loss harvesting. In a recent article, ProPublica authors Paul Kiel and Jeff Ernsthausen reported on the tax savings techniques of billionaires. The authors were able to reconstruct the tax-loss strategies of some of the nation’s wealthiest people using IRS data. For instance, they estimated that from 2014 through 2018, Goldman Sachs was able to generate tax savings of $138 million for Steve Ballmer, former CEO of Microsoft and current owner of the Los Angeles Clippers, without changing his investment portfolio in any meaningful way. In the year 2017, Ballmer’s direct indexing accounts posted over $100 million in tax losses through 15 loss-harvesting transactions, while the performance of the indexes it tracked, was way up. Tax records also show that Goldman Sachs routinely made trades for direct-indexing clients like Ballmer.
Finsum:Based on recent reporting by ProPublica, billionaires such as Steve Ballmer have been able to save billions through tax-loss harvesting in direct indexing accounts.
There’s no question that 2022 was a tough year for investors, but even with all the volatility, investors remain confident in their advisor’s abilities. That is according to the results of State Street Global Advisors’ ETF Impact Survey: Advisor Edition. The survey found an overwhelming majority of investors who work with an advisor remaining confident in their insight and guidance. The percentage of U.S. investors indicating they value their financial advisors’ knowledge and guidance even more during uncertain times held steady at 89% compared to June 2022, when it was 91%. In addition, 81% indicate their advisor has helped them remain confident during this period of rising inflation and market volatility, compared to 86% in June. The survey also revealed that investors are listening to their advisors and not requesting panic-induced trades as 57% of U.S. investors plan to keep their money ‘as is’ and stick to their long-term strategy. Brie Williams, head of Practice Management at State Street Global Advisors had this to say about the survey results, “Helping clients remain confident and committed during times of volatility can be a challenge for advisors whose clients may have a kneejerk reaction to abandon their investment strategy if markets get choppy. Our survey found 86% of investors have discussed market volatility with their financial advisor and 83% say their advisor has informed them of how volatility will affect their long-term financial goals.”
Finsum:A recent SSGA survey found investors remain confident in their advisors’ guidance amid heightened market volatility and rising inflation.