Displaying items by tag: index funds

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) offers investors broad exposure to leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies at a very low cost, with an expense ratio of just 0.09%. While not an AI-specific fund, it tracks the information technology sector, which includes many of the world’s biggest AI players such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, and Broadcom. 

About two-thirds of the fund is concentrated in semiconductors and software, meaning its performance is closely tied to the success of a few dominant firms. Compared with AI-focused ETFs like Global X AIQ, which charges 0.68%, VGT’s low fee structure can translate into thousands of dollars in added returns over time. 

However, its heavy concentration — nearly 45% in Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple — makes it vulnerable to downturns in those key stocks. Overall, VGT provides a simple, low-cost way for investors to benefit from the AI boom without the challenge of picking individual winners.

Finsum: AI makes up a high percentage of GDP growth and this index fund could take advantage of this growing sector. 

While standard ETFs are built for long-term investors, more complex products like leveraged, inverse, and synthetic ETFs are designed for short-term or specialized strategies and carry higher risks. Leveraged ETFs amplify daily index returns, but compounding effects mean they often underperform over longer periods, making them unsuitable for buy-and-hold investors. 

Inverse ETFs, by contrast, rise when their benchmark falls and are typically used as temporary hedges against downturns rather than core holdings.

Synthetic ETFs take a different approach by using swap agreements with banks to replicate index performance instead of directly owning the securities, which reduces tracking error but introduces counterparty risk. These advanced products can be useful in the right hands, yet they require a clear understanding of their mechanics and limitations. 

Finsum: These tools can be tactical moves, not long-term wealth building, but serve short term client desires.

As ETFs continue to evolve, new “enhanced” or actively structured ETFs are emerging as thoughtful alternatives to traditional passive strategies, especially in today’s volatile market. 

Fidelity leaders emphasized how these hybrid ETFs aim to maintain core market exposure while improving on passive models through modest, research-driven security selection. Amid rising concerns like U.S. tariffs and potential recession risks, investors were advised to stay cautious but open to market rebounds following short-term shocks.

Fidelity’s Craig Ebeling noted that passive index tracking can lead to unintended exposures, while enhanced ETFs allow for greater alignment with investor goals by avoiding certain stocks. The Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC), for instance, leverages a quantitative system to actively select large-cap equities and has returned 9.78% since inception. 

Finsum: Investors remain optimistic about long-term opportunities, particularly with enhanced ETFs designed to improve benchmark outcomes.

(New York)

Fidelity is doubling down on its recent move to offer completely free index funds with no investment minimums. The money manager will launch a pair of new free index funds, one focused on large caps, and the other on the “extended market” (or small and midcaps), in late September. The new free funds are part of Fidelity’s strategy to compete vigorously on pricing to bring in new clients, and then try to earn money from them spending on other services.

FINSUM: Fidelity is almost using these funds as loss leaders in order to drum up other business. This may work for them because they have such a large product suite, but for less diversified managers, it poses a serious challenge.

(New York)

For several years Vanguard was seen as the champion of low-cost investing. It led the revolution in ever-lower cost ETFs. However, just recently, it seems to have fallen on hard times as it is facing challenges on multiple fronts. In particular, it is suffering at the hands of Fidelity, which is undercutting it on fund pricing. Fidelity’s recent no-fee index funds mean they are even cheaper than Vanguard’s lowest cost funds. The second, and perhaps even more worrisome challenge, relates to investment minimums, which Fidelity did away with on its cheapest funds. Vanguard’s minimums are now starting to look old-fashioned by comparison.

FINSUM: The best way for Vanguard to compete would be to merge some of the classes of their products. However, doing so would require a big revenue haircut, all of which means the company has some tough choices to make.