Displaying items by tag: diversification

(New York)

One of the ways that investors or advisors might think to diversify their risk is to invest in a number of different managers. The reality is, however, that many of those managers, especially within an asset class, will all have similar looking portfolios, which means you may be much less diversified than you think. The obvious analogue is index tracking funds. There would be no point in buying multiple ETFs from different providers that all track the same index. Yet that is what investors are doing in some markets. This concept is particularly relevant for the riskier end of the credit markets right now, where the market seems to be poised for the same kind of correlated fall as happened during the Crisis. In CLOs for instance, many of the largest loans are held by a majority of the major managers.

FINSUM: This seems like a smart and timely warning. Correlation can doom even the best diversification efforts, especially when it is credit driven.

(New York)

One of the big conundrums in markets is that while it is practically gospel to diversify into a wide range of securities and asset classes, some of the best and most famous investors do the exact opposite. As evidence, just consider the investing styles of Warren Buffett, George Soros, or Bernard Baruch. Forbes has published a piece examining this seeming disconnect, and provides some interesting insights. According to Buffett, “Diversification is a protection against ignorance … [It] makes very little sense for those who know what they’re doing”. Baruch adds, “It is unwise to spread one’s funds over too many different securities … Time and energy are required to keep abreast of the forces that may change the value of a security. While one can know all there is to know about a few issues, one cannot possibly know all one needs to know about a great many issues”.

FINSUM: Okay, a couple of points here. Firstly, those investors can afford the big losses that can occur with a concentrated portfolio. And secondly, since they invest for a living, they have the time to devote to deeply understanding each of their holdings. For the 99.99% of people not in that group, diversification has major benefits.

(New York)

Allocation funds don’t get a lot of discussion in the press, but they could be a good buy. With their broad mandate to invest in all manner of asset classes, an allocation fund can theoretically be a one-stop shop for advisors or retail investors. However, most of them have not lived up to their hype since broad allocation takes more research horsepower than the funds can afford. However, the T Rowe Price Global Allocation fund has been performing great. The fund invests in 20 different T Rowe funds across all strategies. “This fund represents our best thinking across different asset classes”, says the fund’s manager. It has beaten 92% of its category peers over the past three years.

FINSUM: Allocation funds can be a good choice if you want to merely deposit assets into a single vehicle. However, we would worry about having a great deal of one’s assets with a single manager.