Displaying items by tag: best interest

Thursday, 31 May 2018 08:41

Where the SEC Rule Improves on the DOL

(Washington)

The SEC has already faced some stiff criticism for its “fiduciary rule” that does not include the word “fiduciary” in it. The SEC’s proposal makes for a rule much lighter than many expected and it is viewed as very industry-friendly. However, Investment News has put out a piece defending the rule. Investment News thinks that both the SEC and DOL have the same intent, but used a different approach. In its own words, Investment News says “The SEC initiative seeks to raise standards and let investors understand the motivations of their adviser, without limiting choice”.


FINSUM: We think those very last few words really hit at the heart of the SEC effort: it does not limit choice. One of our big gripes with the DOL rule was that it effectively constrained product choice. We feel the SEC likely won’t do that.

Published in Wealth Management
Friday, 25 May 2018 09:49

SEC Takes Parting Shot at DOL Rule

(Washington)
The DOL rule is on the way out and the SEC best interest rule is on the way in, but that did not keep the SEC from taking a parting shot at the DOL. Outgoing SEC commissioner Michael Piwowar, long a critic of the fiduciary rule, said yesterday “I think it was a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad rule … It set up an unworkable, impossible set of standards for people to comply with. The Department of Labor couldn’t have cared what we thought and what you all thought, didn’t listen to Finra, didn’t listen to state regulators or the insurance regulators, and went forward with a rule that proved to be unworkable”. Piwowar is expected to leave the SEC on July 7th following his resignation.


FINSUM: We could not think of a more comprehensive critique of the DOL rule. We think the SEC really “gets” it.

Published in Wealth Management

(Washington)

Advisors all over the country are wondering about a simple question—why the SEC did not use the word “fiduciary” in its new best interest rule. The answer to the question had remained obscure until this week, when SEC chairman Clayton answered it at a conference following a question by FINRA CEO Robert Cook. Clayton said that the new rule is “definitely a fiduciary principle, just like the fiduciary duty in the investment advisor space is a fiduciary principle”, but continuing that calling standards for both brokers and advisors “fiduciary” and “then defining them would not make it clear that the relationship models were different”.


FINSUM: So basically the SEC avoided using the word so as not to muddle the difference between the relationships of brokers to clients vis-a-vis advisors to clients.

Published in Wealth Management
Thursday, 24 May 2018 09:48

New Ruling Means DOL Rule is Gone

(Washington)

It was already all but over, but now it is really over and done with. States, including Oregon, California, and New York, made a last ditch (and well-worded we might add) bid to step in as defendants in the Fifth Circuit court case regarding the DOL fiduciary rule. The sates want to step in to appeal the rule. Last week was their second attempt to do so, and now the Fifth Circuit Court has turned down their second push, which means the ruling appears final. The denial was made by the same panel of judges as originally vacated the rule, though the denial was unanimous this time.


FINSUM: We think the rule is finally gone for good, but never say never in this story.

Published in Wealth Management
Friday, 18 May 2018 10:47

New Effort May Save DOL Fiduciary Rule

(Washington)

The fiduciary rule saga presses on. Just when it looked like it was all over and the DOL had finally avoided its own rule, the court battle is not over. A new group of state attorney generals has just asked the to be allowed to appeal the fifth circuit court’s ruling against the DOL rule. California, Oregon, and New York have all asked for a rehearing of the court’s May 2nd decision to deny their request to step in as defendant. In their appeal, the states said “The federal government is no longer pursuing this appeal … Given that posture, the exceptional importance of the issues, and the grave harm the states will suffer as a result of the panel opinion — billions of dollars in lost retirement income to their residents and tens of millions of dollars in lost tax revenue — the states respectfully request that the court reconsider the decision”.


FINSUM: This is dragging on so long it is even getting annoying to report on! This does not seem likely to be granted, but one can never be sure.

Published in Wealth Management
Page 27 of 31

Contact Us

Newsletter

Subscribe

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top
We use cookies to improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used. More details…