Displaying items by tag: mutual funds

(New York)

Fidelity made a huge splash in the asset and wealth management world’ about a month ago when it launched the markets first completely free indexed mutual funds, and with no investment minimums. The move sparked big share price losses for other asset managers and seemed to spell doom for the industry. But how have the funds actually performed so far? The answer is well. The pair of funds have taken in almost $1 bn of client money in just a month, which is considered a solid success.

FINSUM: We think this is a good showing for Fidelity, but one of the other issues the zero fee funds have brought up is that there are many other terms of index funds that investors need to pay close attention to. Not just price.

(New York)

If there was ever a mantra for mutual funds, it should be this: boring and cheap is beautiful. A new study by Morningstar has found that when it comes to the funds, investors are best off buying ones with very cheap fees, and not just for the obvious reasons. Morningstar dug deeper to understand the relationship between costs and performance gaps, or the spread between the return of the fund itself versus the fund’s average investor. What it found is that in low price funds, this gap was much smaller. While some of that might be accounted for by simply saying those who buy cheaper funds are smarter investors, the reality is that investors are more patient on returns when they hold cheaper funds. There is less incentive to sell, and therefore they hold the funds longer, leading to better returns.

FINSUM: This makes perfect sense to us. If you have an expensive fund that is losing money, you are going to want to dump it quickly. But if a fund is ultra-cheap, you are more inclined to give it some time.

(San Francisco)

Here is some good news for mutual fund investors. While many ETFs have been absolutely hammered by the selloff in FANG shares, many mutual funds have largely evaded the losses. According to Goldman, the average large cap mutual fund is underweight three out of four of the FANGs. Mutual fund managers had frequently grown uncomfortable with the FANGs’ soaring valuations, and as such, many had trimmed their exposure.

FINSUM:Some of the benefits of active management (and the downside of passives) are really exemplified in this data. A win for mutual fund investors.

(Boston)

The moment that many asset managers have been dreading has finally arrived. Fidelity announced yesterday that it was slashing prices on many of its funds, and crucially, offering two new index mutual funds with no fees and no minimums. Thus, the Rubicon has finally been crossed—the first broad index funds with zero fees, and no minimums. Many top asset management stocks fell considerably on the news. Remember that asset managers can still make money on funds with zero fees—through stock lending—but they need considerable scale to make that money meaningful.

FINSUM: It was only a matter of time before this happened. We expect Vanguard will follow suit quite soon, as will BlackRock, as lower fees have been by far the biggest selling point in the market for years.

(New York)

One of the weakest sectors over the last year has been asset management. If you take a close look at some top asset managers, including Invesco, BlackRock, etc, you will see that many are down 20% or more. The growth of passives, pressure on fees, and weak inflows have all combined to bring down the managers. According to Barron’s they look like big bargains. BlackRock, T.Rowe, Franklin Resources, and Legg Mason look like the good bets. There are some great payers in the group too, with Invesco and BlackRock both sporting yields over 4% and AllianceBernstein paying a whopping 8.6%.

FINSUM: Yes, the industry’s traditional model is under fire, but those with very good scale will win out. Therefore, we do think the very top managers are a good buy, especially at these valuations/yields.