Displaying items by tag: active funds

Once seen as a slow-moving defensive play, the utilities sector has surged in 2024, outperforming all other S&P 500 sectors thanks to its unexpected ties to artificial intelligence. With companies like Constellation Energy and Vistra powering AI data centers through nuclear energy, utilities are benefiting from tech-fueled demand growth typically reserved for Silicon Valley. 

This shift has pushed the sector up nearly 26% year-to-date and attracted strong inflows, even outperforming on both market-cap and equal-weighted bases. Traditionally valued for their consistent demand, pricing power, and dividends, utility stocks are now getting a second look from growth-focused investors. 

Actively managed funds like the Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) have capitalized on this shift, delivering over 40% returns by overweighting AI-aligned holdings. Meanwhile, traditional utility ETFs such as XLU, VPU, and IDU remain popular options.

Finsum: AI could continue to reshape what investors expect from the utility sector.

State Street Global Advisors has launched a new series of target date funds—called the Target Retirement IndexPlus Strategy—that includes a 10% allocation to private markets managed by Apollo. 

These funds, structured as collective investment trusts (CITs), pair State Street’s index strategies for public markets with Apollo’s evergreen fund providing exposure to private credit, equity, and real assets. Brendan Curran of State Street likens this evolution to shifting into a new gear in retirement investing, acknowledging the growing significance of private assets in diversified portfolios. 

The collaboration follows earlier efforts between State Street and Apollo, including the launch of a private credit ETF. Apollo views this as part of its broader push to tap into the wealth management space and expand access to private investments, aiming to grow its assets in this segment to $150 billion by 2029. 

Finsum: The launch reflects a broader trend of asset managers integrating private markets into retirement solutions to meet demand for diversification and improved outcomes.

Active ETFs combine professional management with the liquidity and transparency of ETFs, making them powerful tools for portfolio construction. They offer investors access to active security selection and the potential to outperform benchmarks, while still benefiting from intraday trading, tax efficiency, and often lower costs. 

These funds are especially valuable in areas of the market with inefficiencies, where deep research and targeted exposure can improve outcomes. Derivative-income ETFs can enhance portfolio income and stability by generating yield through options, offering an equity-based alternative to fixed income. 

Meanwhile, buffer ETFs help manage downside risk by capping losses (and gains) over set periods, making them useful for preserving capital during volatile markets. 

Finsum: Together, these active ETF strategies provide investors with flexible, diversified, and goal-oriented components for building resilient and adaptive portfolios.

Actively managed ETFs combine the flexibility of active management with the tax efficiency of ETFs, making them a compelling option for taxable portfolios. Unlike mutual funds, ETFs often use in-kind redemptions to minimize taxable capital gains, helping investors defer taxes and achieve greater compounded returns over time. 

While tax efficiency is a significant advantage, investors should also evaluate the manager’s skill, market opportunities, and the cost-effectiveness of these strategies when selecting active ETFs. 

Incorporating active ETFs into a portfolio can be a strategic way to balance the potential for alpha with reduced tax drag, particularly in equity strategies where minimizing distributions is key. 

Finsum: A thoughtful approach to selecting active ETFs can enhance after-tax returns and align portfolios with long-term investment goals.

The predominant sentiment in financial markets is that active funds have an edge during volatile periods because picks are more apparent and therefore easier to execute. However, according to the Euro Securities and Market Authority, active funds didn’t outperform passive funds during the critical stressed market conditions from February 19th to June 30th, 2020. This full cycle in financial markets didn’t give active funds an advantage and actually underperformed by 6.6% annualized in that period. This research backs up previous reports by morningstar that active funds didn’t outperform during high volatility Covid-19.

Finsum: Covid-19’s cycle was the K-shaped recovery Economists dream of, so this isn’t the nail in the coffin for active management.