Displaying items by tag: alts

UBS strategists have warned that the artificial intelligence boom, fueled heavily by private credit firms and lenders, is raising the risk of overheating in the sector. Private credit, once focused on smaller businesses, has expanded rapidly into big tech, with tech-sector debt from non-bank lenders surging nearly 29%—or $100 billion—in the past year. 

The warning echoes concerns from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who recently cautioned that excitement around AI may be inflating a bubble. UBS noted that while this influx of capital could support hyperscaler growth plans, it may also create vulnerabilities if assets sour or growth slows. 

Tech giants including Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet are projected to spend $344 billion in 2025, much of it on AI-driven infrastructure such as data centers. 

Finsum: With private credit now deeply embedded in the sector, analysts caution that investors should carefully monitor risks alongside the sector’s breakneck growth.

Structured notes are often pitched as sophisticated tools for yield and downside protection, but they carry layers of risks that can outweigh their potential benefits. Because they are debt obligations of the issuing bank, their value hinges on the issuer’s creditworthiness, leaving investors vulnerable in the event of a default. 

High, often hidden, fees further erode returns, with some products charging over 2% annually on top of advisor commissions. Liquidity is another concern, as structured notes rarely trade in active markets, forcing early sellers to accept steep discounts. 

Their complex payoff structures can also mislead investors into believing they hold principal protection when in reality protections are conditional and limited. Tax treatment is murky as well, with many products generating taxable “phantom income,” creating unexpected burdens that make structured notes a risky choice for most retail investors. 

Finsum: While structured notes are perfect for lots of investors illiquidity and complexity that may leave investors worse off than with simpler, more transparent options.

In the evolving “post-60/40” investing landscape, alternatives often come with higher fees and reduced liquidity, but investors tolerate these trade-offs for the potential of higher returns and skilled management. Wealth managers stress that allocations should reflect an investor’s liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and experience, with recommendations ranging from a cautious 10% to as high as 50% for those with no short-term cash flow requirements. 

While some, like Marina Wealth’s Noah Damsky, seek niche managers with unique strategies, others—such as International Assets Advisory’s Ed Cofrancesco—favor straightforward private real estate projects for their simplicity and transparency. 

Ballast Rock Private Wealth’s Andrew Mescon highlights private credit and private equity secondaries as compelling opportunities, citing diversification, downside protection, and discounts to net asset value as advantages. Managers also note the growing role of evergreen fund structures, which can ease liquidity constraints and broaden access to these asset classes. 

Finsum: Ultimately, successful alternative investing hinges on aligning product complexity, fees, and liquidity with each investor’s unique financial situation.

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that could reshape 401(k) investing by allowing retirement savers broader access to private equity, cryptocurrency, real estate, and other alternative assets. 

Proponents argue the change could improve diversification and expand opportunities, particularly as more companies remain private, while critics warn of higher risks, limited transparency, and steep fees compared to traditional mutual funds and ETFs. The order directs the Department of Labor and SEC to review guidance and consider rules that would make these investments more accessible within 180 days, potentially encouraging more employers to offer them. 

Supporters in the asset management industry see this as a democratization of private markets, but fiduciary advocates caution that inexperienced investors could suffer devastating losses without strict safeguards. Experts recommend limits—such as capping exposure to 5%–10% of a portfolio—and robust investor education to mitigate risks. 

Finsum: Even if changes take months to materialize, the move signals a major shift in U.S. retirement policy, one that could expand investment menus while also amplifying the stakes for 401(k) participants.

Despite political pushback and policy rollbacks, most large U.S. companies have maintained or even increased their sustainability investments in 2025, according to a survey by EcoVadis. 

Nearly half of executives said spending remains steady, while about a third reported higher investments paired with reduced public promotion — a trend dubbed “greenhushing.” The findings suggest that firms increasingly view supply chain sustainability as a strategic advantage, with many citing its role in attracting customers and maintaining operational stability. 

Only a small share have cut back, underscoring a belief among corporate leaders that sustainability supports long-term growth, even if it’s less publicly advertised. Concerns remain over regulatory rollbacks, with nearly half of C-suite leaders warning they could increase supply chain disruptions. 

Finsum: The data points to a quieter but still committed corporate approach to sustainability in the face of shifting political and regulatory landscapes.