Displaying items by tag: defined contribution

President Trump’s sweeping “Big Beautiful Bill” has stirred surprisingly little excitement within the retirement industry, largely because it leaves the defined contribution landscape mostly untouched. While the law does expand health savings accounts and introduces a limited Social Security tax break for lower-income seniors, it sidesteps deeper retirement reforms that many industry advocates had hoped for. 

Notably, a bipartisan proposal to unlock more than $100 billion in surplus pension and retiree health assets for worker benefits was excluded, frustrating supporters who saw it as a pro-employee measure. On the positive side, the bill preserves current retirement tax incentives, avoiding feared rollbacks that would have impacted savings strategies. 

Outside the retirement space, the bill’s increase to the national debt ceiling could hasten Social Security insolvency by a year, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. 

Finsum: Investors should also consider how the  "Trump Accounts" for children could impact clients’ children

Managed accounts in defined contribution plans have long existed but suffer from low adoption, partly due to limited participant engagement. New technology now allows these accounts to personalize portfolios using more data than just age, potentially improving retirement outcomes. 

Providers are developing hybrid solutions like personalized target-date funds (PTDFs), which tailor asset allocations using existing data without requiring user input. However, experts stress that true personalization—and value—depends on incorporating outside assets and participant-provided details like retirement goals and risk tolerance. 

While artificial intelligence and subscription models may improve engagement, industry leaders see the ultimate goal as total household financial management. 

Finsum: Whether managed accounts can scale effectively and deliver on this promise remains a central question for the future of retirement planning.

The US defined contribution (DC) retirement industry, once buoyed by steady asset growth and strong equity markets, now faces a profitability squeeze due to fee compression, demographic shifts, and intensifying competition. As baby boomers retire and withdrawals surpass new contributions, the system is experiencing net outflows, pushing providers to rethink their business models. 

Recordkeepers are seeing administrative fees decline significantly and are increasingly relying on ancillary revenue streams—like brokerage accounts and financial advice—to offset shrinking margins. 

While total DC system revenues rose modestly between 2013 and 2023, the real surge came from retail wealth management, which generated $45 billion in new revenues, reflecting a shift toward participant-centric strategies. Providers are also contending with rising technology and support costs, prompting restructuring, digitization, and outsourcing, even as consolidation gives larger firms scale advantages. 

Finsum: Retirement solutions providers are being forced to adapt quickly, with success increasingly tied to their ability to expand beyond recordkeeping.

Plan sponsors continue to grapple with low engagement and limited financial literacy when it comes to retirement income within defined contribution plans, according to a new DCIIA study. Many employers are hesitant to implement retirement income solutions due to competing priorities, legal risks, and a lack of internal resources or formal decumulation strategies. 

Complexity, lack of standardization, and concerns over liquidity and portability further complicate adoption. However, plan sponsors anticipate growing interest in lifetime income options through 2025 and 2026, especially as peer adoption increases. 

Safe harbor provisions from SECURE 2.0 are expected to encourage adoption by reducing perceived legal liability, and DCIIA will expand its research later this year to better understand these barriers and opportunities.

Finsum: Solutions that offer personalization, flexibility, and simplicity are most appealing, though widespread uptake may hinge on stronger education and clearer evaluation tools.

Target-date funds are designed for investors with a specific retirement date in mind, automatically adjusting their investment mix to become more conservative as that date approaches. 

These funds typically hold a variety of mutual funds rather than individual stocks or bonds, making them a diversified “fund of funds” that simplifies asset allocation. Early in an investor’s career, target-date funds emphasize growth by leaning heavily on equities, then gradually shift toward bonds to preserve capital as retirement nears. 

Each fund follows a predetermined glide path, which guides the transition from aggressive to conservative investments over time. Investors benefit from a hands-off approach, as the fund handles rebalancing and risk adjustments without the need for active management. 

Finsum: Overall, target-date funds offer a convenient, age-based solution that combines diversification, risk control, and simplicity in a single investment vehicle.