Displaying items by tag: wealth management

(New York)

Most advisors will be familiar with CITs, or collective investment trusts, but outside of wealth management, they are little discussed. Therefore, it may be interesting to learn that the industry has been growing strongly and is approaching $3 tn. A lot of the growth has been through 401(k) sponsors adding CITs to their menus. However, the products may have benefits for many, as they essentially use a mutual fund structure, but have significantly lower fees and distribution costs because they are not subject to SEC rules. According to one money manager, “CITs have always been an option for the retirement market, but once a manager sees that they can offer a CIT cost-effectively, it’s a no-brainer”.

FINSUM: This seems like a poorly understood, but potentially value option for many.

(Washington)

The Trump administration may be on the verge of a large regulatory pullback in wealth management products. In particular, Trump is considering dropping the rule which limits variable annuities. The products have widely been considered too complicated for retail investors and have been limited alongside the DOL rule. Sales of variable annuities fell to $98 bn last year, the lowest figure in two decades.

FINSUM: These products only seem likely to rise again if any fiduciary-type rule disappear. As one advisor put it best, saying “If you are required to put clients’ interests first, they [VAs] almost never make sense”.

(New York)

Morgan Stanley is a world leader in wealth management, but its asset management unit has long left something to be desired. It first sold off the arm after the Crisis, but has been building a new one since. The firm currently has $469 bn under management, paltry compared to Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, both of which has over $1 tn. However, CEO James Gorman says one of his seven year goals is to reach $1 tn. The area is a priority for the firm and according to Gorman “one of the most important growth vehicles we have as a firm right now. I’m very excited about it”.

FINSUM: We imagine there would be a lot of synergistic growth between the wealth and asset management businesses, which would be great for the firm. Additionally, asset management is a capital light business that boosts ROI, which both investors and management love.

(Rome)

In a very interesting, or maybe offensive, release, the Vatican has just put out commentary from the Pope which criticizes financial advice. In a bulletin called “Considerations for an ethical discernment regarding some aspects of the present economic-financial system”, the Pope appears to criticize advisors who are not fiduciaries, listing among its “morally questionable” activities, “a failure from a due impartiality in offering instruments of saving, which, compared with some banks, the product of others would suit better the needs of the clients.

FINSUM: We have no problem at all with fiduciary advice, but we think it is very close-minded when anyone broadly calls non-fiduciary advice immoral.

(New York)

A lot of advisors have been under pressure to cut their fees. Pressure from competition, both digital and human, has reportedly put downward pressure on the fees advisors feel they can charge. However, Barron’s has put out a piece arguing that advisors should not cut their fees. The reason why stems from the results of a survey which found that advisors who lowered their fees actually brought in less assets and experienced less revenue growth than when they left fees higher. An industry commentator summarized the situation this way, saying “That supports something we’ve seen, frankly, for 15 years, which is, clients don’t leave because of price; they leave because of service issues”.

FINSUM: We think this is a bit of a misleading survey, at least if you buy the “services issues” theory. The reason why is that it is only advisors who have service issues that are cutting fees, which means the lower asset growth does not really have to do with fees, it has to do with a problem with the advisor.