In an article for ETFTrends, James Comtois laid out the 2 major benefits provided by direct indexing as opposed to investing in index funds. Until recently, direct indexing was only available to ultra high net worth investors. Now, it’s increasingly available to a wider swathe of investors.

Direct indexing allows investors to gain the benefits of index investing such as low costs and diversification but allows for greater customization and reduction of taxes. With direct indexing, tax losses are harvested on an interim basis and can be used to offset gains.

According to Morningstar, about $260 billion has moved into the category as of the end of 2022. And, this trend is only expected to strengthen in 2023. 

According to Morningstar, “Investing directly in the underlying stocks of an index in lieu of a mutual fund or ETF tracking the same benchmark allows for individually tailored tax management.” Another factor cited is that it allows investors to modify indexes based on their specific values to account for environmental, social, or governance factors. Additionally, investors can prioritize any specific factor they want to emphasize such as value or growth. 

Finsum: Direct indexing has seen massive growth over the last couple of years as it’s become increasingly available to a wider clientele. Two major benefits are a lower tax bill and increased customization. 

Jonathan Brasse discussed a recent white paper from Swiss alternatives group, Partners Group, about why private markets are poised to grow faster than public ones over the next decade in an article for PEREnews.

In essence, Partners Group notes the changing landscape for private markets, and how they are playing a larger role in financing the ‘real economy’. Since 2016, funding on private markets has exceeded that of public markets. Last year, about $400 billion was raised on public markets, while more than $1 trillion was raised in private markets.

Another change is that companies raising on private markets are generally healthier and more profitable than ones listing on public exchanges. These trends are also evident in the real estate market.

Fundraising for real estate in private markets has been steadily growing, while the number of real estate IPOs has dwindled. In terms of future returns, real estate listed on private markets has a better chance to be renewed, repurposed, and transformed, while such expenditures are less common on the public side given the pressures of quarterly earnings and shorter time horizons of public investors. 

Finsum: Private markets have been overtaking public markets in terms of funding. This trend is also happening in real estate markets.

In an article for InvestmentNews, Jeff Benjamin reported on Morningstar’s decision to allow competing model portfolios from other asset managers on its proprietary platform for wealth advisors. 

So far, model portfolios from BlackRock, T. Rowe Price and Clark Capital are being introduced to the platform which was launched a year ago. In a statement, Morningstar Wealth president Daniel Needham noted, “This is an important milestone in the strategic evolution of the U.S. Wealth platform.” 

It’s expected that model portfolios from other asset managers like Fidelity will also be added over the coming weeks. Morningstar sees the addition of more model portfolios as a way to help advisors scale their businesses given the decline in the number of advisors, while the demand for advice continues to increase. 

The company believes that advisors need to outsource portfolio management in order to better serve clients. Additionally, asset managers operating model portfolios have significantly more resources than advisors. 

Surveys show that advisors spend about 18% of their time on managing investments. However, investment performance is not the biggest factor when it comes to client retention. Therefore, integrating model portfolios into their practices can lead to more success for advisors. 

Finsum: Morningstar is introducing model portfolios from asset managers onto its platform. It sees model portfolios as important tools to help advisors grow their practices.

In an article for Oilprice.com, Alex Kimani discussed three reasons why Goldman Sachs is bullish on the energy sector. The bank sees Brent and WTI crude oil trending higher to $100 and $95 per barrel over the next 12 months, respectively. 

The bank sees faster growth in China as supportive of commodity demand overall. Regarding energy, it sees supply pressures from OPEC+ production cuts, embargoes on Russian crude shipments and global growth as key drivers.

Some other reasons cited for favoring energy are attractive valuations. Currently, it has a P/E ratio of 6.7 which is the cheapest among the 11 major sectors, and this is considerably cheaper than the S&P 500’s P/E of 22. 

Despite a slowing economy and lower energy prices, Q1 earnings have remained quite strong. Net margins improved from 11.8% to 10.4%. This is in contrast to most sectors which are experiencing margin compression. Further, earnings are forecast to remain stable over the next couple of years due to low capex, higher costs for new projects, and geopolitical risk. 

Overall, energy stocks offer investors attractive valuations and robust earnings growth potential. The longer-term picture remains attractive due to longer-term supply trends, while demand is expected to remain steady.

According to Russell Investments, the outlook for active fixed income looks quite attractive in 2023. They see opportunities to outperform benchmarks due to market and trading inefficiencies, index construction, and a volatile macro environment due to the lack of clarity around the Fed’s hiking schedule.

Compared to active equity funds, they see more opportunity for alpha in active fixed income for a variety of reasons. A major one is that fixed income indices are constructed with thousands of securities, often with different durations, coupons, and covenants. For astute managers, this can create opportunities to uncover value especially amid rating changes, new issues, and rebalancing by indexes. 

Another favorable factor is that many participants in the fixed income market are not focused on maximizing returns. Instead, there are forced buyers of fixed income due to capital requirements like insurance companies and banks. Further, central banks remain active in these markets as well, and they telegraph their intentions well in advance. 

Finally, there are simply more inefficiencies in fixed income as the vast bulk continue to be traded over-the-counter which leads to less price transparency and wider bid-ask spreads. 

Finsum: Russell Investments sees opportunity for investors in active fixed income funds due to more inefficiencies, less transparency, and more opportunities to uncover value..