(New York)

Markets have been very turbulent lately with no clear path forward. With that in mind, and given the stage of life (retirement) of many clients, a lot of advisors may be looking for some good yields to add to portfolios. Well, it might be good to take a look at utilities stocks. While the focus on investors has been on growth, utilities look good at the moment. Despite the fact that utilities generally lose ground when rates rise, and have lost 2.4% this year, well-run regulated utilities still look like a good buy. In particular, look for utilities that do not have massive amounts of capital tied up in a single asset, like a power plant. This means one should focus on utilities in the electricity transmission and distribution areas.

FINSUM: Beyond the yields, utilities would also seem to be quite good at defending against a downturn, as spending on them would be quite resilient in a recession.

(Washington)

Last week the DOL put out a warning to firms about launching and holding ESG investments. About the socially and environmentally conscious investments, the DOL reminded fund providers that fund performance needs to trump any social impact considerations of the funds. Despite the warnings, Bank of America has just launched five new model ESG portfolios.

FINSUM: What does this mean exactly? ESG portfolios have an explicit focus on social good, which at times could mean the funds either out- or under-perform. To us, this is an odd and pointless warning.

(Houston)

Many investors may still be shy about buying oil companies. After all, oil had a major fallout jut a few years ago and many factors, like green energy, seem to be playing against the future of oil. Accordingly, most oil companies are playing into this logic by cutting back on spending and boosting sources of alternative energy, but not Exxon. The company is boosting R&D spending and trying to grow its gas and oil output counter to all its rivals. Its logic is that demand for gas and oil is forecasted to grow considerably until 2030 as the world’s middle class surges to 5 bn people (versus 3 bn today). One fund manager comments on Exxon that “We think Exxon’s investment opportunities are world-class and that the best time to invest is when everyone else is retrenching”.

FINSUM: Exxon is trying to keep doing what it does best—produce oil. It is interesting they are taking a different approach to the market, but that means they are probably going to have high beta. If you believe in the strategy, it is an interesting buy.

(Washington)

Ding, dong, the fiduciary rule is dead. As was widely expected, the Department of Labor missed its deadline this week to file for an appeal of the fifth circuit court ruling against its fiduciary rule. That means that the ruling given by the fifth circuit court, which vacated the rule, now stands, leaving the rule is all but dead. However, other bodies, including the AARP and the states of California, New York, and Oregon, have all applied to stand in as defendants in the case. None of these requests have been processed yet.

FINSUM: So it will be very interesting to see whether the fifth circuit court approves these requests, especially considering it was so adamantly against the rule.

(Washington)

Over the last several weeks, the market has gone through various fits of panic over whether a global trade war, sparked by the US, might imperil the global economy. However, over that period, sentiment has generally improved, with most investors now thinking a trade war unlikely. That view may be far off the mark, as two major disagreements are worsening. The first is between the US and Europe, on whom Trump may impose additionally steel tariffs imminently. Europeans have vowed to retaliate. With China, the situation is eve more worrisome, as the country has refused to even respond to Trump’s requests tha it slash $100 bn from its trade surplus with the US and lessen its backing for industrial upgrades.

FINSUM: China seems to feel it is finally big enough to stand up to the US. It is probably correct, which means we may end up in a big standoff with Beijing. Here is the big question though—will that ultimately (e.g. 3-plus years from now) be bad for the US economy?