Economy

There is no hiding the huge influx in passive investing over the last couple of decades as a direct result of the ETF boom, but the rise in passive investing is causing more market volatility according to a new academic study. Theoretically with more passive investors active traders will become more aggressive and individual stock demand should be unchanged, but according to the study by UCLA it has increased market vitality and reduced efficiency. Even the skyrocketing number of algorithmic traders can’t offset the passive investors. Markets have far fewer signals and traders to rely on to gain underlying information about a stock, which creates an empty void that is filled up with volatility. Moreover, the paper speculates that as more ESG funds popup this will exacerbate the passive volatility problem.


Finsum: Passive investing has surely increased the average trader's utility, but it comes at the cost of a more efficient market and higher future volatility.

Environmental, social, and governance investing has morphed into a behemoth says, industry insiders, and is so far from its roots that a course correction is needed. Experts and pioneers in the field are disappointed by the amount of greenwashing and fudging in order to meet regulatory standards. ESG has ballooned to approximately $40 trillion and most of the gains have come in the last year. Those in the field want better oversight from the government or non-profit third parties rather than those incentivized to be more lenient. Original ESG was created to mitigate environmental risk and incentivize better behavior, but it’s so over bloated and bound to burst. If regulators in the Biden admin step up like they are signaling it could mean catastrophe for ESG investing.


Finsum: More stable guidelines to remove greenwashers are a must, but it will come at a cost.

Advisors know it intuitively: all stocks are not created equal, even those that look very similar on the surface. Yet, figuring out which to hold out of an ever-expanding assortment is a challenge. Enter an ideal solution: Nasdaq Dorsey Wright’s Technical Attribute Stock Ranking System.

Over its substantial history, Nasdaq Dorsey Wright has created many innovative technical indicators based on Point and Figure charting. One of their best is the “Technical Attribute” ranking, which applies a 0-5 score for every stock (5 being best) based on compiling multiple factors, such as relative strength versus the S&P 500 and relative strength versus an equal weighted index of the stock’s sector, among others. In total, each stock has five scored attributes, including two vs. the market and two vs. the sector, with one additional absolute attribute (trend). The best stocks succeed in all five measures. 

Nasdaq Dorsey Wright has done extensive testing on the effectiveness of the system, and over multiple decades, high-scoring stocks have been proven to outperform lower-ranking stocks. The point of the Technical Attribute Stock Ranking System is to help advisors choose the best stocks they can, especially when making an intra-sector choice or picking between a few seemingly similar funds. By seeing which fund holds the highest concentration of 5s, advisors can be confident in the potential for outperformance. 

Click Here to Access the Tool

Contact Us

Newsletter

اشترك

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top