Displaying items by tag: tax loss harvesting

In a recent article for the Wall Street Journal, author Mark Hulbert defends the use of ETFs in opposition to people who say direct indexing is a superior method of investing. Many brokerage firms that have created direct-indexing platforms say direct indexing is better as it allows investors to create a customized index without stocks that they don't want and also can strategically harvest tax losses. However, Hubert believes that most of direct indexing’s supposed advantages can be duplicated by ETFs at a lower cost. For instance, customizing an index can be duplicated. According to Lawrence Tint, the former U.S. CEO of BGI, the organization that created iShares, now part of BlackRock, anybody could achieve the same result by buying a generic index ETF and then selling short the stocks that we want to avoid. Tint also doubts that direct indexing’s ability to harvest tax losses outweighs the cost savings of investing in a low-cost ETF. He stated that, over time, an investor who sells his losers from his direct-index portfolio will increasingly be left with a portfolio of mostly unrealized gains. So, the benefit of being able to decide when to take tax losses will fall over time. An investor will also have to pay higher fees each year to maintain the direct index. In addition, he also noted that tax-loss harvesting is only applicable to taxable accounts.

Finsum:In an article for the Wall Street Journal, author Mark Hulbert defends the use of ETFs against direct indexing as its ability to harvest tax losses outweighs the cost savings of a low-cost ETF, while customization can be replicated by buying an index and shorting the stocks you don’t want.

For decades, the wealthy have been able to see huge tax savings. Over one hundred years ago, investors could take tax deductions on wash sales, which involved selling a security at a loss and then buying back the same security. While Congress outlawed that technique in 1921, investment firms have continued to help billionaires save on taxes through other techniques such as tax-loss harvesting, which allows an investor to sell an investment for a loss and replace it with a reasonably similar investment. Direct indexing, which continues to gain steam among advisors, provides the perfect strategy to employ tax-loss harvesting. In a recent article, ProPublica authors Paul Kiel and Jeff Ernsthausen reported on the tax savings techniques of billionaires. The authors were able to reconstruct the tax-loss strategies of some of the nation’s wealthiest people using IRS data. For instance, they estimated that from 2014 through 2018, Goldman Sachs was able to generate tax savings of $138 million for Steve Ballmer, former CEO of Microsoft and current owner of the Los Angeles Clippers, without changing his investment portfolio in any meaningful way. In the year 2017, Ballmer’s direct indexing accounts posted over $100 million in tax losses through 15 loss-harvesting transactions, while the performance of the indexes it tracked, was way up. Tax records also show that Goldman Sachs routinely made trades for direct-indexing clients like Ballmer.

Finsum:Based on recent reporting by ProPublica, billionaires such as Steve Ballmer have been able to save billions through tax-loss harvesting in direct indexing accounts.

With direct indexing continuing to gain steam, the strategy isn’t just for the ultra-wealthy anymore, according to two panelists at the recent ETF Exchange conference in Miami. According to Randy Bullard, global head of wealth management at Charles River Development, any investor with more than $150,000 can benefit from these custom portfolios. Bullard stated that “Today an advisor might use direct indexing for clients with complex and unique investment policy requirements, but in the future, direct indexing won’t be such a niche thing.” Ben Hammer, head of client development for Vanguard Personalized Indexing, agrees and said “personalized indexing” can benefit many investors. For Hammer, direct indexing is simple, “It’s an individual account that’s managed to track an index. The individual owns the securities, which gives them flexibility to do things that they can’t with a fund. For example, when individual stocks are down, the investor can tax-loss-harvest them to offset gains elsewhere in their portfolio.” Hammer also noted that direct indexing can give advisors an “additional edge“ in their business. He stated, “They can utilize this to really establish an excellent tax profile for a client that might have some complications or give them an extra bit of customization.” However, Bullard acknowledged that direct indexing right now is for equities, not other asset classes.

Finsum:According to two panelists at the recent ETF Exchange conference, any investor with over $150,000 in assets would benefit from direct indexing, as would advisors by providing them an “additional edge“ in their practice.

With direct indexing continuing to gain steam, the strategy isn’t just for the ultra-wealthy anymore, according to two panelists at the recent ETF Exchange conference in Miami. According to Randy Bullard, global head of wealth management at Charles River Development, any investor with more than $150,000 can benefit from these custom portfolios. Bullard stated that “Today an advisor might use direct indexing for clients with complex and unique investment policy requirements, but in the future, direct indexing won’t be such a niche thing.” Ben Hammer, head of client development for Vanguard Personalized Indexing, agrees and said “personalized indexing” can benefit many investors. For Hammer, direct indexing is simple, “It’s an individual account that’s managed to track an index. The individual owns the securities, which gives them flexibility to do things that they can’t with a fund. For example, when individual stocks are down, the investor can tax-loss-harvest them to offset gains elsewhere in their portfolio.” Hammer also noted that direct indexing can give advisors an “additional edge“ in their business. He stated, “They can utilize this to really establish an excellent tax profile for a client that might have some complications or give them an extra bit of customization.” However, Bullard acknowledged that direct indexing right now is for equities, not other asset classes.

Finsum:According to two panelists at the recent ETF Exchange conference, any investor with over $150,000 in assets would benefit from direct indexing, as would advisors by providing them an “additional edge“ in their practice.

There’s no question that ETFs are a popular way to gain access to the market. They’re low-cost and tax efficient when compared to mutual funds. But, according to a new research paper, ETFs are not the most profitable after taxes are paid. That distinction belongs to large baskets of individual stocks that aren't found in a fund. The paper, which was posted recently by Roni Israelov, the president and chief investment officer of NDVR, and Jason Lu, a research economist in the economic modeling division of the International Monetary Fund, sought to quantify tax-loss harvesting, the strategy of selling losing assets to offset taxable gains that arise when selling winning ones. The paper found that tax-loss harvesting produced the best results when it's used for groups of individual stocks, not ETFs. In a recent interview, Israelov said "You make more money harvesting single stocks across an entire portfolio than you do in an ETF." The paper adds to a growing body of wealth management firms that have been promoting the merits of tax-loss harvesting and boosting the case for direct indexing, a strategy in which investors chose a basket of securities that mirror an index, but is personalized to their specifications.

Finsum: A new research paper found that tax-loss harvesting produced the best results when it's used for groups of individual stocks, not ETFs, boosting the case for direct indexing.