Tuesday, 06 June 2017 00:00

Why the Fiduciary Rule is a Washington Lie

Written by
Rate this item
(15 votes)


The implementation of the fiduciary rule has turned into nothing short of a political debacle, all driven by the DOL, an organization which has usurped the regulatory right to even make such a rule. Forbes has just put out an article showing why the whole mantra of the DOL’s rule is a lie. The idea that fee-only advisers are free of conflicts is false, as they have them just like commissioned brokers. For instance, since fee-based advisors make money from total assets managed, they would have a major conflict of interest when advising whether to pay off a mortgage or roll over a 401(k) to an IRA managed by the advisor, both very common situations. Furthermore, fee-based advice is hugely expensive, costing retirees much more over the life of the relationship than commissions would.

FINSUM: We fervently agree with Forbes’ take on this. Yes, brokers with commissions have conflicts, but so do more-expensive fee-based advisors. We should not have a rule that falsely idolizes the latter.

Source: Forbes

Contact Us



Subscribe to our daily newsletter

We use cookies to improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used. More details…