Displaying items by tag: asset managers

Friday, 12 October 2018 08:57

Are Financial Firms in Trouble?

(New York)

Rising rates are good for financials, right? Well, not always, especially for asset managers. The sector is not as directly impacted by rate rises as banks, and investors need to be on the look out for losses. The whole sector is experiencing a grave fee war, with fund pricing recently hitting zero. All managers are now in an effective race to the bottom on fees and only a handful of winners will emerge, all reliant on increasing scale massively to make the low fees viable.


FINSUM: Asset managers are in a nasty and long-term fight. The damage to shares would have been much worse, but the rise in stocks and other assets has boosted AUM, which has offset a lot of the lost revenue from lower fees, helping to insulate the sector.

Published in Eq: Total Market
Monday, 23 July 2018 12:09

Asset Managers Look Like Major Bargains

(New York)

One of the weakest sectors over the last year has been asset management. If you take a close look at some top asset managers, including Invesco, BlackRock, etc, you will see that many are down 20% or more. The growth of passives, pressure on fees, and weak inflows have all combined to bring down the managers. According to Barron’s they look like big bargains. BlackRock, T.Rowe, Franklin Resources, and Legg Mason look like the good bets. There are some great payers in the group too, with Invesco and BlackRock both sporting yields over 4% and AllianceBernstein paying a whopping 8.6%.


FINSUM: Yes, the industry’s traditional model is under fire, but those with very good scale will win out. Therefore, we do think the very top managers are a good buy, especially at these valuations/yields.

Published in Eq: Large Cap
Monday, 16 July 2018 09:13

US Asset Managers Race to Add Scale

(New York)

As fees fall, there is an inevitable reality in the US asset management industry—scale is everything. Investors need to deeply understand this concern if they have money in the sector. For instance, analysts and the market are putting so much preference on large managers, that one analyst just upgraded BlackRock to outperform, while downgrading Invesco and WisdomTree, even though BlackRock’s P/E ratio is 18.6, and the latter two’s are an average of just over 10. BlackRock’s stock is down 15% in the last year, while Invesco and WisdomTree have both fallen more than 30%.


FINSUM: The more fees need to be cut because of competition, the more money one needs under management to maintain profitability. Hence the battle for scale.

Published in Eq: Large Cap

(New York)

In what comes as an interesting article, Bloomberg has published a piece arguing that instead of the status quo, asset managers should be paying investors for the chance to manage their money. The idea comes from Mercer, a top asset management consultant, and argues that to overcome the problems plaguing active management, investors should agree to pay out a fixed percentage return to investors over a certain timeframe, with the manager keeping any excess that is produced. “We keep getting told by managers that their value creation process tends to be longer than the typical horizon of an investor … This in turn leads to short-termism. Under the new model their investment time horizon can be aligned to their value creation process”.


FINSUM: This would be a total reconceptualization of the way the industry works. The big question is how the investor would get paid if the manager fails to meet the minimum payout. It sounds like third party insurers would have to take part. This is a very interesting proposition.

Published in Wealth Management
Page 2 of 2

Contact Us

Newsletter

Subscribe

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top
We use cookies to improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used. More details…