Displaying items by tag: Mortgages

(Beijing)

All our readers will be aware of the intensifying trade war between the US and China. And while the US seems to have a strong position on trade (with less to lose than its partners), that is not the whole picture. The reality is that the US makes up much of what it loses on trade through massive overseas investment Dollars that flow into US assets. While much of the public’s awareness of this centers on Treasury bonds, one other big area of foreign participation is in MBS, or mortgage bonds. What is much less known is that more recently, foreign buyers, including China, have been much bigger consumers of US mortgage agency bonds (e.g. Fannie and Freddie).

FINSUM: China has the power to simply turn off the spigot on the mortgage market, which could lead to a surge in interest rates and a resulting collapse in prices. That would put US politicians in more hot water than tariffs ever could.

(New York)

A new study out of Harvard makes a very interesting point about US home prices. While real estate prices have seen a strong and steady rise since the bottoms of the Crisis, and prices in many markets seem very lofty, the truth is that the cost of owning a home actually hasn’t risen for the last thirty years. How is that possible? The answer is that while home prices have risen compared to income, interest rates have also fallen strongly, meaning the monthly mortgage payment it costs to actually own a home has remained pretty much flat sine 1987 (on an inflation-adjusted basis).

FINSUM: So this is a good point, but the reality is that the monthly payment does not account for the huge down payment that families now need to come up with (which they did not back when interest rates were at 12%).

(New York)

If we were to tell you that median sales price per square foot was down 18% from a year ago in New York City, would that make you worry about the real estate market? Well, that is exactly what has happened, all alongside sales volume hitting its lowest level in six years in the Big Apple. The developments have brokers and real estate developers worried there, but perhaps the whole country should be paying attention. New York has experienced a great deal of new apartment inventory over the last few years as developers have pushed through many new projects, all of which seems to have conspired to oversupply the market.

FINSUM: The boom in real estate since the Crisis was always urban-driven, and so the downfall may be an urban-led one too. New York’s real estate woes are not unique, so we would not be shocked to see prime urban property fall in value across the country, especially with mortgage rates on the rise.

(Los Angeles)

US real estate has been humming along quite nicely for several years. The market has been so steady as to be considered in a goldilocks period. Rates were low, lending standards slowly slipped, and the market kept rolling with high demand. However, that period may finally now have come to an end as mortgage rates are rising quickly. Mortgage rates just hit a seven year high, which could mean demand for housing softens as borrowers are unwilling to pay higher rates. The average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage now sits at 4.61%. Rates bottomed in 2012 at an average rate of 3.31%.

FINSUM: We think this is definitely going to have an effect on mortgage demand, especially on mortgages in urban areas, where amounts tend to be larger.

(New York)

While the housing market has been doing well and credit markets still look solid on a fundamental basis, there is big trouble brewing in US housing. The proportion of highly indebted mortgage borrowers is surging. Fannie Mae recently increased the amount of total debt as a proportion of income it allows for federally-backed mortgages from 45% to 50%. Rising house prices and stagnant incomes mean that 1 in 5 mortgage borrowers now have 45% or more of their pre-tax income eaten up in debt every month. That is triple the same proportion of borrowers compared to 2016 and the first half of 2017.

FINSUM: The mortgage market has been running out of prime borrowers, and in response, the proportion of subprime borrowers seems to be rising, though this is being accommodated by increased federal support for such mortgages. Are we headed down the same road again?